Wrestling Forum banner
161 - 174 of 174 Posts
She is the Queen, what do you expect?

In all seriousness, hasn't Becky been winning over her several times since their feud started? Charlottes last title reign really doesn't count because they only put it on her to include it in that 3 Way Womens Title match at Mania. It only feels as if shes "most pushed in WWE history" because shes more recent compared to a John Cena or Hulk Hogan.

Is Charlotte the most pushed female in WWE History? Probably. Overall though? Probably not.
Title reigns don't necessarily count as pushes in the WWE. A push is someone who's always featured or in the limelight whether she is champion or not. That's Charlotte. She's been a part of nearly every big women's match since she was called up. As you have said, Charlotte has lost a TON over the past year. But she's constantly pushed into title matches regardless of her actual record.

On pure accolades, Charlotte hasn't had a better 12 months than Becky. She arguably hasn't even won as much as Asuka has over the past 12 months. Yet people have a very different impression of Charlotte because she's been always in the title picture, nearly every month. That's how she's pushed harder. Whereas other women bop in and out of the title picture and don't get the same prominence in TV time as she does.

Roman isn't necessarily more successful than AJ Styles or even Daniel Bryan when it comes to titles and length of reigns. But there's no question he is pushed harder than them. Why? He's always the most prominently featured male on TV, always ends up in main events of PPVs.
 
The difference between Charlotte and every other women in WWE is that she's always doing something. She always has a feud going on, or a storyline of some sort. She's the only woman on the roster who hasn't spent any time on the sidelines. Every other woman has spent a good amount of time doing nothing or just having meaningless matches every week to fill tv time, Charlotte's matches always matter, they make sure of it. She's been in the title picture her entire career, bar three months, 1 of which she was out injured.
 
The difference between Charlotte and every other women in WWE is that she's always doing something. She always has a feud going on, or a storyline of some sort. She's the only woman on the roster who hasn't spent any time on the sidelines. Every other woman has spent a good amount of time doing nothing or just having meaningless matches every week to fill tv time, Charlotte's matches always matter, they make sure of it. She's been in the title picture her entire career, bar three months, 1 of which she was out injured.
If the other women made me care, which they don't in the slightest, bar sexy as fuck Mandy Rose, then I would agree with you. But I have no reason to care about ANY of them at all, I've seen them all have the door opened for them to some degree and either their acting skills or the match skills slammed the door shut.

and you can make the same exact argument about Becky and Rousey easily. I can sit here and say Becky is taking away from Mandy or Bayley's time, etc. But the fact is those two divas (Becky and Rousey) give me a reason to care, much like Charlotte and they haven't done anything to slam the door like Bayley's career suicide promo or Sonya Deville putting her hair up and square up.

Also why is it Charlottes fault? She puts on baller matches and represents the company appropriately? If your job came at you and said you are the physically most gifted; most consistent face in your department and I want to make you the face of the company, are you really going to sit there and tell me you'd say no?
 
No she is not. It seems that way because the number of her title reigns are accelerated. Clearly they want her to surpass her father's number of title reigns, but what has to be understood is that some females' careers are not going to last as long as males for the simple reason of them wanting to start families and give birth. Charlotte is in her early 30's and the biological clock is ticking. So, they will get her to 17 as quick as possible before she possibly decides to hang it up and become a mother.
 
After MITB, there's no doubt that at the very least, she's the most pushed woman in WWE history. Becky has been one of their top stars for a year now and WWE STILL wouldn't let her just win her damn feud with Charlotte, Charlotte just HAD to get the win in the blowoff match.

And now it's pretty much guaranteed that Charlotte is getting yet another title feud already. I wonder if any of the other women in the back are getting irritated with how blatant WWE's favoritism towards her is yet?
 
Agree about biological clock which mention by @cai1981.

Women have limited date of their prime, Charlotte might be learn from Nattie who stuck with her career and still not have little normal family like have kid despite she's gonna hit her fourty. Charlotte probably tell about she's gonna settle down to Becky or her closest friends and who knows once her contract is up, she might be done or at least want take break, perhaps WWE have desire to make her the first women in Wrestling entertainment industry who become 16 times women's Champions as fast they can.

And you know she have strong backup factor to achieve her dream like Triple H is Ric's mark, Vince never have prime Ric to work on his company for long period and she is one of original product of WWE developmental program(never work for Indies).
 
No she is not. It seems that way because the number of her title reigns are accelerated. Clearly they want her to surpass her father's number of title reigns, but what has to be understood is that some females' careers are not going to last as long as males for the simple reason of them wanting to start families and give birth. Charlotte is in her early 30's and the biological clock is ticking. So, they will get her to 17 as quick as possible before she possibly decides to hang it up and become a mother.

And this poses the question: Is this really necessary? Is anyone but Vince or Triple H actually asking for this? Didn't they say that Charlotte's legacy was supposed to be separate from that of her father? Cause forcing her to surpass her father's record within the span of 5 years is going to do nothing but make her stand out less from papa Ric.
 
Didn't they say that Charlotte's legacy was supposed to be separate from that of her father? Cause forcing her to surpass her father's record within the span of 5 years is going to do nothing but make her stand out less from papa Ric.
What they say and what they do changes from hour to hour. Remember when Charlotte had the whole feud with Ric and Ric raised Sasha's hand after Sasha beat her for the title in Charlotte, NC???? Well, the Flair was added to her ring name while she was (storyline) on the "outs" with Ric. Vince changes his mind on a whim all the time.
 
And this poses the question: Is this really necessary? Is anyone but Vince or Triple H actually asking for this? Didn't they say that Charlotte's legacy was supposed to be separate from that of her father? Cause forcing her to surpass her father's record within the span of 5 years is going to do nothing but make her stand out less from papa Ric.
No, it’s not necessary.

No, no one aside from Vince, Trips, and probably Charlotte, want it.

And :lmao at the notion that Charlotte’s legacy is separate from Ric’s. Charlotte is only where she is because of Ric, and forcing Charlotte and shoehorning her into every single thing the way WWE does is actually sending what little part of Charlotte’s legacy is actually earned to the dump.
 
How many title reigns can we attribute to old Charlotte and new Charlotte though?

Image


Image


Don't you dare try telling me that is the same person.

I reckon this current Charlotte has about 4 titles. Old Charlotte retired with a very respectable 5 titles.
 
161 - 174 of 174 Posts