[METTY]

Which of the these two do you feel is/was WWE's/Vince McMahon's most loyal employee?

The Undertaker or Shawn Michaels.

Discuss...

 

[Kratosx23]

Well, Taker had to threaten to break Shawn's neck to get him to put over Austin at WM, so.....

 

[#BadNewsSanta]

Both are very loyal but Taker... you couldn't ask for someone more loyal. Even as he's breaking down nowadays he still puts forth the most effort he can to try and give the audience a good show.

 

[The Caped Crusader]

Shawn shouldn't be mentioned when it comes to who is the most loyal employee of the WWE. This is the same man who has politicked, sometimes where it would be to the detriment to the business, and even refused to put over Austin, resulting in Taker having to step in. He was a known piece of shit before he changed himself during his injury.

Taker is far more loyal than him and the most loyal man in the company.

Another notable mention would be someone like Kane. He's remained faithful to them, turned down some big opportunities mainly because he didn't want to get in the way of younger stars, has always come across as smart when promoting WWE, and always worked with younger talent to help them.

 

[-Narc-]

Taker and its not even close. Shawn is not even in comparison to loyalty to Taker is. If you refuse to put someone over, your not loyal. Plain and simple.

 

[vanderhevel]

idk how this is even a discussion, only time shawn was happy was when vince was kissing his ass and letting him get his way.

guy was pathetic, forfeiting titles instead of losing them, refusing to put people over, and just being a douche junkie throughout the nineties.

 

[Geeee]

HBK isn't in the top 15% most loyal...

 

[The Caped Crusader]

Here's a few more people, all more loyal than Shawn Michaels was:

- The Rock
- John Cena
- Funaki
- Brooklyn Brawler
- Owen Hart

Actually, I'll take back my comment about Taker being the most loyal man in the company. He's the second most loyal.

I'm going to say Kane is the most loyal. He's been with the WWE since 1993, has never complained about his spot, has always been willing to put over superstars, willingly remained away from the main event so as to help younger stars, turned down title runs (you know, when he was a very hot act in the company), has been involved in some of the most stupid angles in history but still hasn't bitched or moaned, and like I said before, always come across as very smart when promoting WWE.

Shawn Michaels shouldn't be on that poll. It should be Kane.

Kane is the most loyal man in the company.

 

[just1988]

Well, Taker had to threaten to break Shawn's neck to get him to put over Austin at WM, so.....

This. HBK was only loyal towards the end of his career, he was a selfish prick by all accounts before then.

 

[Shazayum]

Why be pretentious and put their real names in the poll?

 

[WutChagoNAdoBrothA]

Undertaker

 

[Unsexed]

Howard Finkel. He's been there longer than either of them. Also, he's actually an employee whereas HBK and 'Taker aren't.

 

[laurennnx34]

Taker. HBK isn't even in Taker's range of loyalty to the company.

 

[Mr.King]

Undertaker.

 

[Notorious]

Well, Taker had to threaten to break Shawn's neck to get him to put over Austin at WM, so.....

Both are very loyal but Taker... you couldn't ask for someone more loyal. Even as he's breaking down nowadays he still puts forth the most effort he can to try and give the audience a good show.

Taker and its not even close. Shawn is not even in comparison to loyalty to Taker is. If you refuse to put someone over, your not loyal. Plain and simple.

idk how this is even a discussion, only time shawn was happy was when vince was kissing his ass and letting him get his way.

guy was pathetic, forfeiting titles instead of losing them, refusing to put people over, and just being a douche junkie throughout the nineties.

Taker. HBK isn't even in Taker's range of loyalty to the company.

This.

 

[vanderhevel]

someone voted for shawn just to stop it from being 100% undertaker. noone can possibly think shawn is more loyal than taker.

 

[I Hear Voices]

Undertaker by a country mile.

 

[METTY]

Why be pretentious and put their real names in the poll?

Why not?

 

[METTY]

Howard Finkel. He's been there longer than either of them. Also, he's actually an employee whereas HBK and 'Taker aren't.

Wrestlers are employees.

 

[apokalypse]

we all can agree on undertaker who willing to put guys over, great worker who never have problem at backstage like Shawn Michaels/The Clique and still stick with WWF\E during bad times and good times until now. if Vince Went bankrupt within 2 months around 1998 i bet anymoney HHH along with Shawn will jump to WCW with his friends NASH-HALL have a group call The Clique.