Wrestling Forum banner

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
SWAG/SPICE
Joined
·
26,780 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
End the brand split, and have things back to just the WWE title, and the IC title being the number 2 belt. Thus having an mass amount of main eventers spread out vastly to help out all divisions. Probably ridiculous, but, just a thought.
 

·
SWAG/SPICE
Joined
·
26,780 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
In all honesty, let's retire the WWE belt instead.
LOL, they would never, in the process of this retiring with the belt, a new title design for the WWE title and tag titles would be put to work. I think things would pick up. Taker indeed should be the one to retire with it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
604 Posts
It'd be a nice send off, and the Undertaker would deserve it, but do you think taking the WHC instead of the WWE championship would be below the man?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,293 Posts
Make the belts mean something again.....YES Taker should so there could be 1 champion for both shows
gives the CHAMP more competition and credibility having to defend it against the roster.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,649 Posts
It'd be a nice send off, and the Undertaker would deserve it, but do you think taking the WHC instead of the WWE championship would be below the man?
No,Because having the honour of retiring with a world title is big enough the way it is.
 

·
Asuka
Joined
·
96,233 Posts
Retire the WHC alltogether? No. Hell no.

As far as letting someone retire as a world champion, Undertaker deserves it. He should retire as WWE Champion, in the main event of WrestleMania, going over Cena at WM 29.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,254 Posts
Unless it's something like Edge retiring the belt because of a career ending injury, I only think they should retire the belt permanently if someone who retires is champ.
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top