Wrestling Forum banner
21 - 40 of 123 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
5,024 Posts
First off this is awesome and I can't wait!

2nd off HAHAHAHAHAA @ Dave...Truly a joke
Dave: I was right. I told you plans could change.

This is Dave trying to set up Tony as the hero who stood up to the big, bad network. And a lot of people will take his report — which was wrong — as gospel and run with that narrative.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,115 Posts
Dave: I was right. I told you plans could change.

This is Dave trying to set up Tony as the hero who stood up to the big, bad network. And a lot of people will take his report — which was wrong — as gospel and run with that narrative.
Well something must have changed between last week and today if they were only allowed a graphic and some armbands and now they're apparently allowed to honor him, and Mark is allowed to wrestle.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,343 Posts
Amazing we get to see Mark on Dynamite and Lethal's the perfect opponent. It's going to be loud and it's going to be emotional, I daresay a few in the Kentucky crowd and watching at home will be struggling to hold it together.

Tony takes a lot of shit but once again he comes through for the fans and he comes through for the boys. Top man.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,024 Posts
Well something must have changed between last week and today if they were only allowed a graphic and some armbands and now they're apparently allowed to honor him, and Mark is allowed to wrestle.
The idea that WBD had a ”policy” — Dave’s word not mine — that Mark Briscoe wasn’t allowed on the network as of last night or this morning (whenever he definitively said, on video, flat-out NO that Mark Briscoe wouldn’t be allowed) is laughable. Policies are in writing so someone produce the handbook with all network policies that mentions Mark Briscoe.

Heck, show me a report that Tony wanted Mark to wrestle on the show last week (seems pretty far-fetched as I’m sure he was in shock and being there for his family) and was told no.

SRS reported that Mark would have been allowed to wrestle all along but wouldn’t have wanted to without Jay. That sounds a lot more believable.

Dave got it wrong. It happens all the time. It’s beyond my comprehension that people would give this guy $11.99 a month to get incorrect reports and then ‘plans changed’ explanations every time he’s wrong.
 
Joined
·
6,165 Posts
I'm of two minds here. I'm happy that Mark is going to be on AEW television, where the Briscoes belonged, and it makes me feel good to know he's out there surrounded by friends when he needs them most, but that this match couldn't happen before Jay died is wrong. It's also wrong that a proper farewell on Dynamite wasn't authorized last week; now it looks as if it took a lot of negative feedback for WBD to change course.

Silencing and ostracising others doesn't foster growth. People change, but only if given an opportunity to have experiences that challenge their worldview. Sometimes change isn't even what's needed; people from different backgrounds often struggle to understand each other and may see their individual opinions as further apart than they are. With everyone trying to shout the loudest in order to 'win' the social battle we're losing the ability to listen and learn. A lot of people no longer know where the line is between truth and conspiracy or ethical and tyrannical.

It used to be that people had to prove themselves in order to be granted a platform from which to speak. Giving everyone a public voice is a noble idea, but in practice, it leads to ... where we are today.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,330 Posts
I'm of two minds here. I'm happy that Mark is going to be on AEW television, where the Briscoes belonged, and it makes me feel good to know he's out there surrounded by friends when he needs them most, but that this match couldn't happen before Jay died is wrong. It's also wrong that a proper farewell on Dynamite wasn't authorized last week; now it looks as if it took a lot of negative feedback for WBD to change course.

Silencing and ostracising others doesn't foster growth. People change, but only if given an opportunity to have experiences that challenge their worldview. Sometimes change isn't even what's needed; people from different backgrounds often struggle to understand each other and may see their individual opinions as further apart than they are. With everyone trying to shout the loudest in order to 'win' the social battle we're losing the ability to listen and learn. A lot of people no longer know where the line is between truth and conspiracy or ethical and tyrannical.

It used to be that people had to prove themselves in order to be granted a platform from which to speak. Giving everyone a public voice is a noble idea, but in practice, it leads to ... where we are today.
Great Post.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,115 Posts
The idea that WBD had a ”policy” — Dave’s word not mine — that Mark Briscoe wasn’t allowed on the network as of last night or this morning (whenever he definitively said, on video, flat-out NO that Mark Briscoe wouldn’t be allowed) is laughable. Policies are in writing so someone produce the handbook with all network policies that mentions Mark Briscoe.

Heck, show me a report that Tony wanted Mark to wrestle on the show last week (seems pretty far-fetched as I’m sure he was in shock and being there for his family) and was told no.

SRS reported that Mark would have been allowed to wrestle all along but wouldn’t have wanted to without Jay. That sounds a lot more believable.

Dave got it wrong. It happens all the time. It’s beyond my comprehension that people would give this guy $11.99 a month to get incorrect reports and then ‘plans changed’ explanations every time he’s wrong.
People use policy to refer to a simple stance on things all the time, they don't have to codify it and put it in a company wide handbook.

Tony certainly wasn't asking Mark to wrestle last week, don't be silly, but he obviously wanted to do more as evidenced by the tribute show they were forced to sandwich in between Dynamite and Rampage.

So what changed that they're allowed to honor Jay with what I'm assuming will be a 10 bell salute, a video package and someone or a few people giving an address, because something obviously changed, one of those things possibly being an already less strict stance on Mark being waived -- because SRS also just tweeted this

"I'm told the new bosses at WBD gave AEW the permission to book Mark Briscoe on Dynamite." almost like they didn't have permission previously :unsure:
 

· Super Moderator
MRS. RANDY ORTON
Joined
·
37,471 Posts
I am in the group of people who think things people said in their past shouldn’t be held against them forever as people say stupid things, which also may have had a different connotation back then, and grow from it, however, really quite funny to read the people here saying that while holding shit against members of this very forum years and years later.
:badass:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,328 Posts
WBD is drawing way more attention to this crap than is even necessary at this point. How many people would even know what the Briscoes said in the past if they didn't keep enforcing the ban? I still don't even know what they said, but the general consensus is that they were extemely apologetic about it in recent years so what's the issue?
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
46,563 Posts
Guilt by association. Gotta love the weird Woke cultists.
Its not even so much that and more "We need to do this to keep the Woke cultists off our back".

Trust me, most of these executives don't really care about this shit and aren't truly down with the cause. Most of what they do is loud proclamations to keep the online mobs from going crazy.

If Warner doesn't really want the Briscoes around, it is because they fear a backlash over tweets from 10 years ago. Its insane, but that's the world we live in.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,877 Posts
The executive confuses me. Unless they're a massive wrestling fan then they wouldn't know who Jay Briscoe is. If they're a massive wrestling fan, then they'd have seen how apologetic he has been about his historic view.
I doubt the executives do a full background check on every wrestler. I don't think any executive would watch each and every show.
 
21 - 40 of 123 Posts
Top