Know tri= 3 brands but duo-brand ppvs didn't make sense.
PG, aside I think wwe did alot better when, they had RAW ppvs, then SD ppvs.
It gives, the champ plus challenger more than 3 weeks of build up, gives the US/IC title match build up:shocked: also gives some mid-card grudge feud, along side other matches.
Sales also started going to shit after the tri-brand ppvs took place. People pay to see there fav. superstar, and its alot eaiser if you can do so ever 8 weeks and not 3.
What made Summerslam, Survivor Series, Rumble, and Mania the big 4. Cause both world titles were defended at one ppv. Now all ppvs are the same.
Is there any indication that wwe might end this crap?
PG, aside I think wwe did alot better when, they had RAW ppvs, then SD ppvs.
It gives, the champ plus challenger more than 3 weeks of build up, gives the US/IC title match build up:shocked: also gives some mid-card grudge feud, along side other matches.
Sales also started going to shit after the tri-brand ppvs took place. People pay to see there fav. superstar, and its alot eaiser if you can do so ever 8 weeks and not 3.
What made Summerslam, Survivor Series, Rumble, and Mania the big 4. Cause both world titles were defended at one ppv. Now all ppvs are the same.
Is there any indication that wwe might end this crap?