It's wwe logic, Cena being a dick to people doesn't get a mention from the announcers either.
The story of Punk's reign was that some superstars thought he was an unworthy champion.I agree he does need to explain himself. I don't know the back story to the feud because during that time period I wasn't really into wrestling. The WWE should really start giving him more mic time though. They hardly ever let him talk which is lame and doesn't make any sense at all because he used to cut some good promos back when he was a heel.
Great point. That's why I hated the Orton / Helmsley Wrestlemania 25 fued. Triple H kicked Randy Orton out of Evolution because he was jealous RKO had the title and made his life a living Hell ever since so when Randy finally won the Royal Rumble to try to avenge himself again, he was the bad guy?!! GTFO.This is one of the reasons why I don't like Randall's face turn right now. All of a sudden its okay for him to punt people in the skull (make them forfeit their title too) and RKO people out of nowhere. He hardly even speaks now as well. So until there's more explanations for Randall's actions, I'm on CM Punk's side for this feud. He also should come out on top of the feud too but I'm sure the WWE will have the face win in the end.
That's right. Amazingly, WWE has not backed themselves into a corner with this storyline because Orton's actions never need explanation. Fortunately that aspect of the character has remained fundamentally intact despite being a nominal babyface.Orton's character doesn't need explanations for what he does, so I don't see why he would do that. Simply put, it wouldn't make sense.