Joined
·
11,581 Posts
in WWE's opinion, all change is good...which is a disgusting business philosophy.
Unfortunately, that doesn't pertain to Cena.in WWE's opinion, all change is good...which is a disgusting business philosophy.
I agree that there's no reason to have two titles, but why keep the belt with zero prestige and lineage? For the pretty butterfly design?The number of people in Womens division is low enough as it is, no point in having 2 titles if you only really use the same 6 divas over and over. They don't care enough about the division. Frankly until they bring in some real wrestlers instead of models it will never take off.
They have Kharma, and I bet my bottom dollar they cannot use her because there are only really 2 divas who can actually (safely) wrestler with her because the rest are just too fragile.
The 2 I'm talking about is Natalya and Beth. Natalya needs to be given a good run at the title, she proves every single match that she is definitively the most talented there. A fued with Beth would be easy considering Natalya is face but WWE just don't seem to want to make it happen, and we all know why that is...(She's a Hart)
Marketing, if I had to guess.Unfortunately, that doesn't pertain to Cena.
I agree that there's no reason to have two titles, but why keep the belt with zero prestige and lineage? For the pretty butterfly design?
but why keep the belt with zero prestige and lineage?