Wrestling Forum banner
1 - 20 of 37 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,588 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Sure he was a crap wrestler, but he was over as hell, could cut a promo, had two title reigns and headlined two Wrestlemania PPVs.

Seems strange at a time Bischoff was signing anybody with the slightest bit of name value. Actually, it seems strange WCW waited two years to sign him.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
784 Posts
Sid was known to just disappear at random. Jumping back and forth. WCW to WWF in 91 back to WCW in 93 to USWA in 94 back to the WWF in 95

The 1997 thing was he started no showing and taking time off. He wanted to play softball I guess.

WCW only signed him cause he started work with ECW in 98/99


Sent from my iPhone using VS Free
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,589 Posts
Sid was known to just disappear at random. Jumping back and forth. WCW to WWF in 91 back to WCW in 93 to USWA in 94 back to the WWF in 95

The 1997 thing was he started no showing and taking time off. He wanted to play softball I guess.

WCW only signed him cause he started work with ECW in 98/99


Sent from my iPhone using VS Free
Sid Vicious was actually signed because Scott Hall and Kevin Nash pushed for him to be signed as Sting began working a lighter schedule and Goldberg wasn't as popular as he had been. The plan was for Sid Vicious to come in and feud with The New World Order as a babyface and Sid Vicious actually ended up getting a better contract that anyone else on the roster outside of Sting and Hulk Hogan.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,782 Posts
Sid Vicious was actually signed because Scott Hall and Kevin Nash pushed for him to be signed as Sting began working a lighter schedule and Goldberg wasn't as popular as he had been. The plan was for Sid Vicious to come in and feud with The New World Order as a babyface and Sid Vicious actually ended up getting a better contract that anyone else on the roster outside of Sting and Hulk Hogan.
This. Sid was supposed to be fresh blood for the nwo to feud with. But by the time he debuted, nwo had dissolved so they turned him heel. Plus wcw always saw money in Sid vs Goldberg...to bad Russo ruined it... I heard before Russo came in wcw was hoping for Hogan vs Goldberg II, Sid vs Nash and heel Sting vs Face Bret Hart at starrcade 99.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,589 Posts
This. Sid was supposed to be fresh blood for the nwo to feud with. But by the time he debuted, nwo had dissolved so they turned him heel. Plus wcw always saw money in Sid vs Goldberg...to bad Russo ruined it... I heard before Russo came in wcw was hoping for Hogan vs Goldberg II, Sid vs Nash and heel Sting vs Face Bret Hart at starrcade 99.
The problem with that though was Sting just couldn't work as a heel because the fans simply wouldn't accept it and Bret Hart had already been babyface and heel in WCW by that time and was already struggling to be what WCW expected him to be. Someone said something i really agreed with in a comment in a story on a wrestling site and that was that Eric Bischoff was a great ideas guy but couldn't do storylines so he needed someone who could turn the ideas into storylines but Vince Russo was a fan of breaking kayfabe and making things a lot more real which is why WCW was so horrible in 1999 and most of 2000 as they simply couldn't mesh well.

On topic though and i have no idea why WCW saw money in Goldberg/Sid because it was always going to be horrible as neither man could work in the ring, Sid Vicious played a great crazy heel but was average on the mic whilst Goldberg was horrible and there were better options for both men available. Sid Vicious was at his best when working with someone who was believable in against big men but could work in the ring like Sting or Shawn Michaels whilst Goldberg needed to have matches limited to ten minutes maximum because he couldn't work for longer as shown in WWE.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
784 Posts
The problem with that though was Sting just couldn't work as a heel because the fans simply wouldn't accept it and Bret Hart had already been babyface and heel in WCW by that time and was already struggling to be what WCW expected him to be. Someone said something i really agreed with in a comment in a story on a wrestling site and that was that Eric Bischoff was a great ideas guy but couldn't do storylines so he needed someone who could turn the ideas into storylines but Vince Russo was a fan of breaking kayfabe and making things a lot more real which is why WCW was so horrible in 1999 and most of 2000 as they simply couldn't mesh well.

On topic though and i have no idea why WCW saw money in Goldberg/Sid because it was always going to be horrible as neither man could work in the ring, Sid Vicious played a great crazy heel but was average on the mic whilst Goldberg was horrible and there were better options for both men available. Sid Vicious was at his best when working with someone who was believable in against big men but could work in the ring like Sting or Shawn Michaels whilst Goldberg needed to have matches limited to ten minutes maximum because he couldn't work for longer as shown in WWE.
Goldberg and Sid actually tore it up at Halloween havoc 99


Sent from my iPhone using VS Free
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,138 Posts
The problem with that though was Sting just couldn't work as a heel because the fans simply wouldn't accept it and Bret Hart had already been babyface and heel in WCW by that time and was already struggling to be what WCW expected him to be. Someone said something i really agreed with in a comment in a story on a wrestling site and that was that Eric Bischoff was a great ideas guy but couldn't do storylines so he needed someone who could turn the ideas into storylines but Vince Russo was a fan of breaking kayfabe and making things a lot more real which is why WCW was so horrible in 1999 and most of 2000 as they simply couldn't mesh well.

On topic though and i have no idea why WCW saw money in Goldberg/Sid because it was always going to be horrible as neither man could work in the ring, Sid Vicious played a great crazy heel but was average on the mic whilst Goldberg was horrible and there were better options for both men available. Sid Vicious was at his best when working with someone who was believable in against big men but could work in the ring like Sting or Shawn Michaels whilst Goldberg needed to have matches limited to ten minutes maximum because he couldn't work for longer as shown in WWE.
And trhat is the reason why some people don't get to book matches. Because some people just want "good wrestling matches", and that is why we sometimes get Lance Storm vs Al Snow matches, which by wrestling standards could be very good matches, but would not draw shit.

Goldberg did draw, same with Sid to a certain extent, and fans like the perception of two monsters fighting each others, despite the match might suck.

Btw that match did not suck.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,782 Posts
The problem with that though was Sting just couldn't work as a heel because the fans simply wouldn't accept it and Bret Hart had already been babyface and heel in WCW by that time and was already struggling to be what WCW expected him to be. Someone said something i really agreed with in a comment in a story on a wrestling site and that was that Eric Bischoff was a great ideas guy but couldn't do storylines so he needed someone who could turn the ideas into storylines but Vince Russo was a fan of breaking kayfabe and making things a lot more real which is why WCW was so horrible in 1999 and most of 2000 as they simply couldn't mesh well.

On topic though and i have no idea why WCW saw money in Goldberg/Sid because it was always going to be horrible as neither man could work in the ring, Sid Vicious played a great crazy heel but was average on the mic whilst Goldberg was horrible and there were better options for both men available. Sid Vicious was at his best when working with someone who was believable in against big men but could work in the ring like Sting or Shawn Michaels whilst Goldberg needed to have matches limited to ten minutes maximum because he couldn't work for longer as shown in WWE.

The thing is, Bret was going to be coming back after his brothers death, so he was going to be mad over. Feuding with Sting would have been good. Sting couldve turned heel on Bret after what Bret did to him the year before. Or they could have done face vs face.

Sid/Goldberg was a great match at Halloween Havoc 99, they brought some great intensity to their feud. It should have lasted longer than it did. There I quit match was way to short but was on its way to being good.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,640 Posts
I also liked Sid. He wasn't the best wrester, but he was charasmatic, and he was over. His entrance was cool. The music was awesome, and the fist thing with the fans was pretty cool too.

Survivor Series 1996, got a good reception. The crowd was really pro sid, and anti Shawn Michaels.

The reason as to why he was fired. I don't know
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,195 Posts
I also liked Sid. He wasn't the best wrester, but he was charasmatic, and he was over. His entrance was cool. The music was awesome, and the fist thing with the fans was pretty cool too.

Survivor Series 1996, got a good reception. The crowd was really pro sid, and anti Shawn Michaels.

The reason as to why he was fired. I don't know
Always liked Sycho Sid. Most fans wanted him 2 win WWF title off HBK & I watched him Vs Hogan WM 8. His interview was awesome with I RULED THE WORLD. He's beaten Bret Hart twice especially after he won fatal 4-way, he dropped it next night on RAW.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,653 Posts
Sure he was a crap wrestler, but he was over as hell, could cut a promo, had two title reigns and headlined two Wrestlemania PPVs.
He wasn't fired. He had problems with his back and kinda drifted out because of it. I do recall Sid having issues with JR over healing time and surgery.

Seems strange at a time Bischoff was signing anybody with the slightest bit of name value. Actually, it seems strange WCW waited two years to sign him.
Almost two years anyway, his WWF toy contract (Or something) extended into 1998.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
180 Posts
Sid circa 96/97 was absolutely fantastic, but it's a shame he failed that drugs test and what not and didn't have a bigger run as "Sid Justice" with WWF from '92 onwards, or he would have gone onto become one of best heels of that particular decade. Imagine him in a feud with Bret or Luger in 1993 and 1994. It would have been golden IMO.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
20,269 Posts
Sid was fired, because the entire WWF locker room, as well as corporate and every last person involved was jealous of his good looks and badass voice. This has been confirmed by millions of people.

While he wasn't the best wrestler (I don't think he's bad at all), his promos are just legendary. Everything he did between Royal Rumble 92 and Wrestlemania VIII is just gold. Some of the funniest promos I have ever seen. SID JUSTICE FOR LIFE.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
19,071 Posts
I did some research and it turns out it was a contract dispute of sorts. In one of his shoots, he talks about being injured (allegedly from a car accident) and WWF not paying for it or something like that.

Supposedly, he also kept throwing fits over having to do jobs. On a RAW not long after WM XIII, he did a clean job to Undertaker in a rematch and he basically had to be threatened with being fired if he didn't do it.

- Vic
 
1 - 20 of 37 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top