My number one is The Million Dollar Man Ted DiBiase. You want to talk about a guy that had everything? That dude had EVERYTHING! Great wrestler, could work with anyone. Had the presentation, the character, & the presence. He could cut promos like no other and get more heat than a 1000 suns. That was the heel they should have given the belt too.
My other big on is Roddy Piper, entirely on strength of personality and character. I mean that dude was the hottest villain in the world in the mid 80s and it never crossed their mind to give him the belt at least once? I mean I know the Hogan gravy train was running, but not even one reign? Really?
Why only the WWE title? because it's twice as prestigious as the WHC RIGHT NOW? A decade ago the WHC was more prestigious than the WWE title, in fact, between 2002-2005, being a WHC meant what being a WWE champ means now.
You can't look at the title's current prestige & make judgment on the past, especially when the WHC was clearly the #1 title at some point.
"The best wrestler to never win the Raw world title" would have been better.