Wrestling Forum banner

Who is the worst big man of the worst?

  • The Big Show

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • Giant Gonzalez

    Votes: 59 32.2%
  • Yokozuna

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Nathan Jones

    Votes: 6 3.3%
  • Mason Ryan

    Votes: 7 3.8%
  • The Great Khali

    Votes: 98 53.6%
  • Kevin Nash

    Votes: 8 4.4%
  • Andre the Giant

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Earthquake

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Viscera / Mabel

    Votes: 2 1.1%
1 - 20 of 67 Posts

· Banned
10,861 Posts
The Big Show-He is a good wrestler

Giant Gonzalez-Worst

Yokozuna-At 600 pounds,he can do super kicks

Nathan Jones-Don't remember him much

Mason Ryan-Unproven

The Great Khali-Second worst.Great debut,has a looks.Thats about it.

Kevin Nash-No Way

Andre the Giant-The greatest Big Man Ever

Earthquake and Viscera / Mabel-Don't know much

How the hell did you put Andre on this list-He is the greatest Big Man ever.

· Butter My Arse
16,593 Posts
I'll say Khali, purely for the fact that the first time I saw Giant Gonzalez walk down the aisle at Royal Rumble 1993, as a ten year old I shit my pants. Although that ring attire was fucking embarrassing.

I'll add another name to the list: Ron Reis aka Reese from The Flock and THE YETAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!

· Registered
23,172 Posts
I am shocked no one mentioned/voted for Nathan Jones. He was/is that bad, very very bad.
He was the definition of a flop. They were going as far as making him Undertaker's tag team partner at Wrestlemania XIX but then realized he sucks and shouldn't be part of Taker's WM career. Then he was away for a while and returned as a heel as part of Team Lesnar at Survivor Series. But as you see, he never had any impact. Hell, the first thing I remember him for now is the fact Chris Benoit did an awesome Missile Dropkick on him when they had a match.

As for the answer, considering that The Great Khali has held the title, it's him. I don't know much about Giant Gonzales but I can see that he was awful too. The Big Show doesn't belong here, though. He has good mic skills, was good in the ring back in his earlier days and actually has been able to be entertaining one way or another in the past. Now he's worthless, though.

· Registered
258 Posts
There are only two legitimate answers here: Gonzalez or Khali. Any votes elsewhere is a vote out of personal dislike, not an objective opinion.

Out of the two I voted for Gonzalez as Khali managed to have an almost passable feud with Cena a few years back. Gonzalez never had a watchable match that I have seen. (The Mania match vs Taker is embarassingly awful).

So Gonzalez, but Khali will win as he is recent and you probably need to be 25 at least to know who Gonzalez is.
1 - 20 of 67 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.