[jonoaries]

I honestly don't know. I usually can pay attention to long feuds if they are spiced up right.
The only problem with 2010 version was that neither was in top form.
but if I'm asked to sit through another undertaker vs kane or triple h vs randy orton match I'll nut up.

 

[Until May]

I didnt really mind it so its all good with me.

 

[twistoffate89]

I don't think revisiting feuds is inherently bad, Kane and Undertaker has been done to death too many times already, and done better than recent incarnations. That makes it hard to enjoy.

Also they're not exactly at the peak of their athletic careers, which hurts it a bit IMO.

 

[C.M.Punk93]

I Enjoy the feud if kane is pwning

 

[FLAW]

It has yet to become boring for me

 

[Hotdiggity11]

It's a feud that got boring like 8 years ago. Whenever they can't think of something to do with Taker and Kane at the same time, they just throw them in a 2-3 month blow-off feud for kicks.

 

[RiseAgainst]

Was boring will be boring. Line.

 

[Reservoir Angel]

Still hasn't for me yet.

 

[NasJayz]

It never got boring for me.

 

[sharkboy22]

Their feud in 2004 and their match at Mania was pretty damn awful IMO.

 

[manjiimortal]

The big problem with their feud is that it was made by Vince Russo, and because of that it didn't really made any sense.
They start with the acusation from Paul Bearer that Undertaker had killed their parents, and scarred Kane. Taker didn't really deny it, although he said that Kane had always liked to play with fire, impying that Kane was the culprit.
They had their feud in the first half of 98, then by early Summer Kane just disses Bearer and allies with Taker until late 98, when Undertaker goes all dark side, rekindles his association with Bearer (who had betrayed him 2 years before), admits he killed their parents, and locks up Kane in a mental institution?!

How the hell does this work?! And to make matters worse Taker and Kane kept fighting, and working together randomly as the years went by! And Kane was revealed to not have his entire body burned, but just his face! Then he could talk when he was supposed to not be able to do it! And then his facial scars were "mental scars"! Then they had a book try to explain Kane life, and it just complicated things!

And it got to a point that their feud became more complicated then a DC superhero that got his life retconed during all the crisis crossovers they did!

Taker/Kane was only good from the begining in 97, until the spring of 98 before all the crazy turns began.

 

[amnesiack]

In 2000. their feud before SummerSlam was just plain stupid.
"Why did I attack my brother? I, AM, A, MONSTER"...
That was the explanation why Kane turned heel fpalm
And the match/brawl was just horrible, it was the first
time Kane lost his mask, in the most anti-climatic way
imaginable.

 

[Von Doom]

Didn't bore me, more confusing than boring, they'd feud, team up, feud, team up, feud, team up, feud etc etc. Stopped making sense after a while.

 

[Von Doom]

In 2000. their feud before SummerSlam was just plain stupid.
"Why did I attack my brother? I, AM, A, MONSTER"...
That was the explanation why Kane turned heel fpalm
And the match/brawl was just horrible, it was the first
time Kane lost his mask, in the most anti-climatic way
imaginable.

I have that DVD, Kane with just half the mask on and one of his eyes exposed is absolutely terrifying. The only thing that was good for though was proving to any idiots who thought that Kane hasn't always been played by Glen Jacobs, you can tell it's him first when he's wincing on the ground, and then when he botches and nearly falls over the motorbike