Joined
·
25 Posts
undertaker always win his match at wrestlemania, however now he is not so strong just like when he was young. At 90's periode, undertaker was a monster, he almost won his match not just in wrestlemania, but in 2000 periode he is getting old, many superstars has beaten him at any matches except wrestlemania...
Last year, undertaker still won and kept his streak at wrestlemania, but after that he became a jobber again, he lost to kane three time in ppv match...
Now he is going to return and everyone said the streak should not be broken ... whatever ...
undertaker is an old man now, his body is not that strong anymore and a jobber, why should let him keep the streak?
It's not making any sense, that guy always win at wrestlemania, but he is jobber outside the wrestlemania ... so what is so special about the streak???
Mike tyson ever had his first lost (the first undisputed real champion), goldberg ever lost his streak ... undertaker now is not the old undertaker but yes he is old now ...
I remember the montreal screwjob when the hitman didn't want to drop his champion belt by loosing to shawn, for real ... mcmahon ask the referee to ring the bell and told the crowd that shawn was the winner via submission hold (sharpshooter) eventhough the hitman didn't tap out ...
what I'm saying now, perhaps it's good idea if undertaker get screwed at wrestlemania this time, he will lose to his opponent whoever he is, the idea is let mcmachon or shawn michaels to be a guest referee, after 20 minutes of fighting and the opponent hits tombstone to undertaker, next the opponent pins undertaker, then the reff hit the quickest 1 2 3 (eventhough undertaker kicks out at 2.9) as the result the streak is broken ... the undertaker will be angry with the referee, destroys the surround entire ring and that will be epic show ...
Last year, undertaker still won and kept his streak at wrestlemania, but after that he became a jobber again, he lost to kane three time in ppv match...
Now he is going to return and everyone said the streak should not be broken ... whatever ...
undertaker is an old man now, his body is not that strong anymore and a jobber, why should let him keep the streak?
It's not making any sense, that guy always win at wrestlemania, but he is jobber outside the wrestlemania ... so what is so special about the streak???
Mike tyson ever had his first lost (the first undisputed real champion), goldberg ever lost his streak ... undertaker now is not the old undertaker but yes he is old now ...
I remember the montreal screwjob when the hitman didn't want to drop his champion belt by loosing to shawn, for real ... mcmahon ask the referee to ring the bell and told the crowd that shawn was the winner via submission hold (sharpshooter) eventhough the hitman didn't tap out ...
what I'm saying now, perhaps it's good idea if undertaker get screwed at wrestlemania this time, he will lose to his opponent whoever he is, the idea is let mcmachon or shawn michaels to be a guest referee, after 20 minutes of fighting and the opponent hits tombstone to undertaker, next the opponent pins undertaker, then the reff hit the quickest 1 2 3 (eventhough undertaker kicks out at 2.9) as the result the streak is broken ... the undertaker will be angry with the referee, destroys the surround entire ring and that will be epic show ...