[ChiefMorley]

Will Take get his revenge on Kane and Barret or just forget about it. Afterall Kane did beat Taker at 3 ppvs so there has to be some blow off where Taker gets his win back?

 

[Tombstoned]

Well actually losing a feud for once helps the Undertaker no end, because people can now consider the chance that he can lose again in the future. Suddenly his matches are way less predictable. Doubtless he will move on to this feud after Wrestlemania though.

 

[CM12Punk]

We won't know till next week. I predict he's just going to squash them heading into Mania.

 

[Rated R Superstar]

Apparently he dug out of his own grave, so in terms of importance...

Interrupting 52250th Return > Getting Buried Alive

and

Stopping Undertaker Return > 5 Post-Match Brogue Kicks PLUS Possibly Career-Ending Steel Pipe Attack



This is what makes WWE.

Oh yeah, Kane. He come back for him when it's time aka Kane's retirement.

 

[TTshining]

It might be a main focus first of the HHH-Taker. It might be a focus on Extreme Rules (Taker-Kane and Barrett) plus Sheamus-Hunter. If they will put the two matches in the Mania, it might suck, in my opinion. Barrett is not having a big push in his career, he's there, but he's not yet deserving to face Taker, especially in Wrestlemania. Also, for Sheamus-HHH, especially now, Sheamus is losing his spark to his place right now, defeated by Mark Henry is really a clear statement that Sheamus is losing momentum and might regain momentum first before facing Hunter again.

 

[NoLeafClover]

Lol, WWE probably will just pretend it didn't happen.

Just like they are going to pretend that H/Sheamus don't have beef.

 

[A Double]

I don't even know yet if we're supposed to remember this fued, or Sheamus/HHH.

 

[AmWolves10]

What Undertaker/Barrett/Kane feud? And what Sheamus/HHH feud?


























Pst: The correct answer is both of those feuds are too unimportant to be brought up during the road to Wrestlemania and WWE is making the right choice by ignoring them. Seriously do any of you really want to see a Kane/Taker/Barrett match?

 

[CainTheUndertaker]

I reckon the Kane feud will be shelved until it is time for both of them to retire, but Barrett will have his crack at Taker post-Wrestlemania.

 

[Unsexed]

Pst: The correct answer is both of those feuds are too unimportant to be brought up during the road to Wrestlemania and WWE is making the right choice by ignoring them. Seriously do any of you really want to see a Kane/Taker/Barrett match?

Taker/Kane? No. Taker/Barrett yes. A singles programme with a veteran like 'Taker is exactly what Barrett needs to improve. And considering that he's going to be one of the guys who's going to be a top star for the rest of his career, I'd start work on making him so sooner rather than later.

I am actually pissed off that WWE went for the Attitude Era style short sighted, hotshot booking bullshit with this match.

 

[Andy362]

Well, I doubt they'll continue the Taker/HHH feud after Wrestlemania so they will probably do them afterwards. Taker/Barrett and HHH/Sheamus both have the heat to be gimmick matches at Extreme Rules.

 

[Forever Red]

Not sure why the Kane thing needs to be revisited. Faces don't have to come out on top every time.

They had a rivalry, the final match was Buried Alive, Kane won, end of story.