Wrestling Forum banner
21 - 40 of 43 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,054 Posts
There's two ways to answer this. One in the absolute sense, and another in the relative one.

1. Hogan is absolutely bigger in that he is over four inches taller than him, and so he'd carry a bigger bone frame. So yes, Hogan is bigger.......However.....
2. Brock is bigger relative to his respective height since he fills his bone frame out with more muscle than Hogan did at his peak.

See below. Brock in 2003 had a much fuller chest, bigger side delts (shoulders), bigger traps (neck/shoulders) and most definitely a much wider back than Hogan.
Also below is Hogan from 1988, which is about his peak. He's clearly not as 'full' as Brock in multiple muscle groups.



 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,768 Posts
Sid is bigger. But I wouldnt say he completely dwarfs Hogan. I think Hogan is closer to Sid in size, than Brock is to Hogan TBF.

And remember this is 1992 Hogan, who was smaller than he was in the 80's.
View attachment 112272 View attachment 112273
Hogan bloated as hell post 82. That Rumble picture really highlights the hgh belly. 1988-89 was peak Hogan hgh belly. Look like a pregnant woman lol
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,637 Posts
One of the reasons Hogan was as great as he was. To be as big as he was and sell the way he sold, thus gaining sympathy from the majority of a fanbase throughout multiple eras was, quite frankly, brilliant.
Hogan succeeded because he was a unique being, an anomaly. And I say that as someone who was not a huge fan. Big guys also tend to be one note and sort of one dimensional bruisers and bland. He not only sold a lot in matches for a big guy but he was so charismatic for a big guy. And for a good guy super-hero, most often than not, he was fighting like a heel(fingers in the eyes, always on offense, etc...). It should not make it sense but it did.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,118 Posts
One of Hulk’s best physiques was near the end of his full-time run. He was yoked in 2002 and THAT’S A FACT, JACK!


48-49 years old, BROTHER!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,425 Posts
One of Hulk’s best physiques was near the end of his full-time run. He was yoked in 2002 and THAT’S A FACT, JACK!


48-49 years old, BROTHER!
He had altered his training methods, so to speak from 2000 onward based on visual evidence.

Hogan slimmed down tremendously, starting in the second half of 1991 and extending to 1993, and from that point he remained very lean throughout his nWo run. However by 2000 he had gained a significant amount of muscle mass back and looked much, much closer to his Golden Era physique. If he did change supplements, it might have been in light of the fact that the script had flipped by 2000 and now almost everyone was jacked up in the WWE and WCW.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,118 Posts
He had altered his training methods, so to speak from 2000 onward based on visual evidence.

Hogan slimmed down tremendously, starting in the second half of 1991 and extending to 1993, and from that point he remained very lean throughout his nWo run. However by 2000 he had gained a significant amount of muscle mass back and looked much, much closer to his Golden Era physique. If he did change supplements, it might have been in light of the fact that the script had flipped by 2000 and now almost everyone was jacked up in the WWE and WCW.
Hogan is actually slimmed down here too compared to the 80s. He usually held a lot of water weight and had a fuller, more bloated look. He was jacked with a lower body fat here, similar to his Hollywood Hogan look in the 90s. Maybe he used diuretics and was more strict with his diet here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seafort

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,118 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
649 Posts
I see Hogan as 6'4" at his absolute tallest.

He was dwarfed by 6'10"-ish Andre in '87.

He was dwarfed by 6'7" John Studd in '85-'86.

He was dwarfed by 6'8" Dennis Rodman in '97-'98.

He was noticeably shorter than 6'6" Sid in '92.

He was noticeably shorter than 6'5" Zeus in '89.

He was noticeably shorter than 6'4" Troy Aikman in that Rent-A-Center commercial they did a while back.


I just don't see any room for 6'5"-6'7" in here anywhere. I think a lot of people got hoodwinked by WWE's 6'8" billed height all those years.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
115 Posts
I’m 6”1 and there is no shot Hulk Hogan in the 80s was only 2 inches taller than me lol.

My guess was that Hogan at his peak was around 6”5, maybe close to 6”6. That is before the additional height he got from wearing boots.
Obvious typo, I meant 6'6" as guesstimated in celebheights.

As for his current height, I have no idea, but 6'3" seems generous? Perhaps in street shoes?
 

·
Lifting weights and eating steaks
Joined
·
21,598 Posts
There's two ways to answer this. One in the absolute sense, and another in the relative one.

1. Hogan is absolutely bigger in that he is over four inches taller than him, and so he'd carry a bigger bone frame. So yes, Hogan is bigger.......However.....
2. Brock is bigger relative to his respective height since he fills his bone frame out with more muscle than Hogan did at his peak.

See below. Brock in 2003 had a much fuller chest, bigger side delts (shoulders), bigger traps (neck/shoulders) and most definitely a much wider back than Hogan.
Also below is Hogan from 1988, which is about his peak. He's clearly not as 'full' as Brock in multiple muscle groups.



Jesus christ, Brock looks like a monster bere.
 
21 - 40 of 43 Posts
Top