Re: University of Windsor Associate Professors Do Study On Romantic Storys & Women In
There aren't any characters in the divas division though. Nearly all of them are "reality" show bimbos who act like they're still in high school. Do you really think watching the Bella Twins, Eva Marie, Cameron, etc. is "escapist fun"? Because those are the ones who get most of the air time. Cameron is a pure face? She doesn't have ANY endearing qualities. You're right about Kaitlyn, except you left out the fact that she barely did anything because she was always taking the backseat to less talented people.Who wants to watch women and men that are close to reality? It's a TV show ... "reality" is what you see in real life. I don't want to see "real" characters. I want to see psychos, crazies, vengeful gold diggers ... It's escapist fun.
That said, the babyfaces in recent years are as pure as they come as well. I can't remember the last time Nat was portrayed as any of the above. Once AJ turns face, she'll be more of the same as well. Naomi and Cameron are pure faces. When did they act like any of the above? When did Kaitlyn act like this? Study is nothing more than confirmation bias from what little I can tell of it and not objective at all. At least not how they've portrayed it in a couple of paras.
The good guy/gal role model hasn't been forced out of the WWE. They're still there if you actually watch the product.