It wasn't a good promo, but I didn't find any issue with continuity at all really. As mention, he craved power, not responsibility (from kayfabe/character perspective).
He didn't want to fight Taker because he didn't want to be forced into being the guy to end the streak. He wants to fight Brock because the guy broke his arm and is trying to take his company to the cleaners.
Writing is so inconsistent. I wonder how much turnover they have on their writing staff, because it's like none of them know the history of any of the guys they're writing for.
hell , during his build up for the match against Taker for WM 28 he said that he's not "that guy" anymore , and that he deals with things from a business perspective , and that undertaker is a "brand"
lol
this is WWE's yet another example of zero continuity , the writing staff are basically a group of retards looking for a corner in a round room
WWE is simply too inconsistent in general for any feuds to make any impact on a larger scale than "insert big name vs insert another big name", for reasons like this, where Triple Hs character is literally the opposite of what he was during his feud with The Undertaker. Tbh, I'm treating WWE like I did TNA from 2010-2011, b-level crash TV with no continuity and little shits given about actual storylines, if you try throwing logic out of the window and stop thinking about the feuds, there may be something mildly entertaining coming out of it, but otherwise, trying to think about RAW on a serious level in an enthusiastic manner is not going to be very rewarding right now. I hope they have some huge creative overhaul, their product is suffering but the ratings have been failing aswell, so I hope that in a few months time WWE will try to change their product in a major way.
why the hell should brock lesnar agree to fight triple h when triple h ripped up his contract ?
all brock cares about is money ...that was made clear when he told johnny ace his new demands . so how does him fighting triple h get him his money back ?
from brock lesnar perspective it makes no sense but of course nothing in wwe makes any sense
why the hell should brock lesnar agree to fight triple h when triple h ripped up his contract ?
all brock cares about is money ...that was made clear when he told johnny ace his new demands . so how does him fighting triple h get him his money back ?
from brock lesnar perspective it makes no sense but of course nothing in wwe makes any sense
Triple H pisses me off. He is nothing more than a fucking washed up old ass can't let go of the spotlight son of *****. He always has too be the center of attention.
Yea, cause he's on 53 Raw's a year and basically main events all the PPV's, right?
Triple H is very good for business. Fans are always excited to see him, and his match with Lesnar is going to sell big time, and it will be great as well.
The match will be accepted on the 1000th episode of RAW after Lesnar attacks Shawn Michaels. And exactly one year later when there's a new summer feud building. You will say there's no way it will be as good as HHH/Lesnar.
I personally thought they'd go the Taker/Lesner angle rather than HHH. With Taker being well known for the being the dressing room General to all the guys, who better to step up and show Lesner (who hes previously had that UFC meeting that went nowhere with) just how legitimate the WWE can be and put Brock in his place. This is the house that Taker built and no one holds it to ransom. etc etc.. just seemed more angles that could work with Taker than HHH,
He's an ass kisser pretending to be a rebel tough guy. That's why his DX gimmick never worked with me. A backstage ass kissing politician cannot be a rebel anti-authority figure. They just don't go hand in hand.
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.