So with Money in the Bank coming up in a couple of months, it'll be interesting to see if they will just do one MITB match for a unified title match contract, or if they'll have the traditional two matches, one for each belt. That could be how the titles end up getting split once again. It could be a cool angle, if Bryan had to deal with the possibility of 2 different guys cashing in at any given time.
Also, splitting the titles may also be an option for how to give Lesnar a title at SummerSlam. I would assume that they have big plans for Lesnar in the future, otherwise his victory over Undertaker would be useless. In my opinion, anything less than a major title win, and preferably a title defense at WM31, would be a disappointment. We know that they can't really give him the unified title for a long period of time since he's gone for months at a time. But you could give him the World Heavyweight Championship, let him take it with him when he leaves, and in the meantime you'd still have the WWE Champion on TV every week.
So it could play out like this:
Two guys win MITB contracts in June. The winner of the WWE Championship contract successfully cashes in and wins the belt from Bryan sometime in July. Then have Bryan vs Lesnar at SummerSlam for the World Heavyweight Championship, with Lesnar winning the belt. Lesnar could then take his customary time off, maybe come back and defend the title a couple of times, say at Survivor Series and Royal Rumble. Then he could defend it at WM31, and perhaps lose it to some up-and-comer like Reigns or maybe even back to Bryan in a rematch.
Thoughts?
