Joined
·
980 Posts
Yeah. WWE would be 10x better no more PG cause I hate it.
You should be banned for being dumb... "oh gosh I remember the good old days of late 90's, even though I was born in 2002., the WWF back then was probably rated R"Yeah. WWE would be 10x better no more PG cause I hate it.
Let me make this simple, the PG rating isn't the problem, the problem is creative.Yeah. WWE would be 10x better no more PG cause I hate it.
Co-signed.Let me make this simple, the PG rating isn't the problem, the problem is creative.
Double co-signedCo-signed.
Buried and humiliated? I doubt it. If he put over those guys, he'd do it in a way that gave them credibility and I'm sure that he'd want to. He doesn't seem like a selfish guy at all. Vince would know better than to treat Kurt badly in wrestling/storylines. The fans would be pissed because of how good Kurt is. Also, could you imagine how good a Bryan vs Angle match would be?why would Angle ( one of the best in wrestling industries ) return? To be buried and humiliated by shitty guys like Miz and Del Rio ? ..
So I'm guessing you were around 18 when Hogan was in his prime? Cause, like, you know... he couldn't possibly have been your childhood hero if you weren't a child back then.who cares about john cena, even with the rap gimmick the crowd would one day hate him, wwe wants him to be the kids hero, like the next hulk hogan, the only thing was when hogan was big the whole crowd loved him not just girls in 13 under kids, hogan was a family name and wwe should realise people are getting sick of John Cena