[Mr Shadow]

Since Undertaker became the man, when has he lost clean?starting from November 91-now?

All Mankinds victories over him had interference.Austin hit a low blow followed a stunner at Summerslam 98.Kane interfered in Taker's loss against The Rock at RAW 98,Daivari interfered against Great Khali...


w/Austin vs Outlaws vs Nation vs Kane/Mankind - RAW 98 (Kane pinned Taker)

w/Kane vs Rock,Mankind,Shamrock RAW 98 (Rock pinned Taker)

Stone Cold - RAW 99

Brock Lesnar - No Mercy 2002

Kurt Angle - No Way Out 2006

w/Batista vs HBK/Cena - No Way Out 07 (Cena pinned Taker)

Batista - Cyber Sunday 2007

Jeff Hardy - Smackdown 2008 (idr if it was clean,tho)

Big Show - Smackdown 09

Elimination Chamber09 - (HHH pinned Taker)

Vladimir Kozlov - Smackdown 09

Kane - Night of Champions 2010 (I think?)

 

[Emotion Blur]

Kozlov beat him clean on SD in 2009.

 

[Vic Capri]

Brock Lesnar - No Mercy 2002

Heyman interfered numerous times. Not clean. :yum:

- Vic

 

[Mr Shadow]

Heyman interfered numerous times. Not clean. :yum:

- Vic

But like you buddy said about Rock/Austin WM 15...It wasnt directly connected to the finish

 

[IT'S VADER TIME]

Mankind beat him clean at KotR 1996.....how was beating him with the mandible claw not "clean"?

Brock beat him clean at NM 2002. Yea Heyman threw the belt to Brock for a minute in the middle of the match but that doesn't detract from it being a 100% clean win in everyone's books.

 

[Mr Shadow]

Mankind beat him clean at KotR 1996.....how was beating him with the mandible claw not "clean"?

Paul Bear got involved

 

[IT'S VADER TIME]

Paul Bear got involved

Bearer didn't aid Mankind in anyway...yes he "got involved" but that's what managers do. Still a clean win.

Brock's win at NM was totally clean too, yes Heyman got involved, again he's a manager that's what they do, but it didn't have any impact on the match or the finish. Heyman interfered but then 15 more minutes of match happened.

If you think any match where a manager gets involved disqualifies the victory from being "clean" you are sadly mistaken. It only makes a win "unclean" if it has a direct impact on the finish. Having a little interference in the beginning of a match, then having 15 more minutes of match with a clean finish isn't tainting the victory. It's just what managers do. That's why Brock beat Rock clean at SS 2002.

 

[Mr Shadow]

Bearer didn't aid Mankind in anyway...yes he "got involved" but that's what managers do. Still a clean win.

Brock's win at NM was totally clean too, yes Heyman got involved, again he's a manager that's what they do, but it didn't have any impact on the match or the finish. Heyman interfered but then 15 more minutes of match happened.

Yea it did, Paul Bear got on the apron and accidentally hit Taker with the urn,which led to Mankind using the claw

 

[Rick_James]

Paul Bear got involved

Did they face each other at King of the Ring in 1996? I know they did at Summer Slam that year, I saw it live, and yes, Paul Bearer did interfere.

 

[IT'S VADER TIME]

Yea it did, Pual Bear got on the apron and accidentally hit Taker with the urn,which turned the tide of the match

I'm sorry but your wrong abut this. Mangers gets involved in matches, that's what they do. Unless it has a direct impact on the finish (manager hits Take with the urn and he immediately gets pinned) then the match still has a clean finish. Don't give me this turned the tide crap.

 

[IT'S VADER TIME]

And you cant refute that Brock beat Taker square 1-2-3 in the middle of the ring at NM.

 

[Mr Shadow]

I'm sorry but your wrong abut this. Mangers gets involved in matches, that's what they do. Unless it has a direct impact on the finish (manager hits Take with the urn and he immediately gets pinned) then the match still has a clean finish. Don't give me this turned the tide crap.

And Taker getting ready to beat Mankind only to get hit by the urn and have Mankind use the claw right after is not a direct impact? If Taker hadnt gotten hit, he would've tombstoned him and won

So was Punk's win over Cena clean at mitb 2011? Lauranitis interfered to keep thing in order, that's his job,right?

 

[Mr Shadow]

And you cant refute that Brock beat Taker square 1-2-3 in the middle of the ring at NM.

I never said it wasnt clean...It's on the list. I was responding to vic who he said was not clean

 

[redban]

The Stone Cold low-blow at Summerslam 1998 is splitting hairs.

Look at the entire match, not just the ending. The referee relaxed the rules from the get-go; he let the two of them fight through the crowd for minutes without counting them out, for example.

The referee saw the low-blow (look at his mannerisms), but he chose not to disqualify Austin for it. Undertaker even handed the belt to Austin to acknowledge that he got beat.

I consider the Summerslam 1998 match a clean loss for Undertaker.

 

[The Lady Killer]

Didn't Big Show also knock him the fuck out on a PPV during their fued? I think that counts as well.

 

[Mr Shadow]

That's why Brock beat Rock clean at SS 2002.

Actaully No, of you watch the match, withing the first 10 minutes of the match, The Rock had Lesnar in the sharpshooter and he was ready to tap, had Heyman not interferred, Lesnar would've tapped as he was dead center of the ring

 

[The Lady Killer]

Did anyone ever tap to Rock's Sharpshooter, though? I doubt they would've had Brock tap to that.

 

[Mr Shadow]

Didn't Big Show also knock him the fuck out on a PPV during their fued? I think that counts as well.

Yes.That was on Smackdown in early 09,Taker went for Old school and Big Show caught him with the WMD

 

[The Lady Killer]

Oh, I thought it was one of their PPV matches.

 

[KingLobos]

Did anyone ever tap to Rock's Sharpshooter, though? I doubt they would've had Brock tap to that.

Can't think of one. Mankind got screwed in it though with official ruling be tap out.