Joined
·
75 Posts
Re: the reason HHH is more of a challenge now than at WM17 is because of how old take
So, it's still real to you
So, it's still real to you
I thought Taker was 47? Trips is 41.Just thought I'd throw this in here. Triple H is only three years and approximately eight months younger than Undertaker.
Uh, no. He's the game. He laughs in the face of age.You realize HHH has aged the exact same amount yes?
They are both in great shape. Both are leaner than they have ever been. As far as conditioning is concerned, when was the last time you seen a bulkly muscular guy win a marathon?HHH has aged and is pretty old at 41 obv, but he is 5 years younger than the undertaker which is a lot when you consider they are in their 40s. also, look at triple h's conditioning compared to the undertaker's. triple H is in better shape at 41 than the undertaker has ever been in his life
Seriously?HHH has aged and is pretty old at 41 obv, but he is 5 years younger than the undertaker which is a lot when you consider they are in their 40s. also, look at triple h's conditioning compared to the undertaker's. triple H is in better shape at 41 than the undertaker has ever been in his life
I agree with FLAW's post.Seriously?