Wrestling Forum banner

Which name do you like better?

  • Claudio Castagnoli

    Votes: 29 17.3%
  • Antonio Cesaro

    Votes: 139 82.7%
1 - 20 of 71 Posts

43,122 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I don't care if you're an ROH/KOW mark. Be honest. I'm kinda leaning towards Antonio Cesaro tbh. Then again, I only became a mark for the guy when I saw his match with Hero in FCW. Was a very good watch, and I was amazed right away by his style, and knew it would fit WWE easily.

So anyways, which name do you like better? nothing serious, just wondering. lol

· Premium Member
8,738 Posts
I like both names. CESARO is a pretty bitching name for a WWE superstar, and The Superior Swiss Sensation Claudio Castignoli was a splendid name in it's own right. Personally, I've found that once you adjust to a new name, there's little difference in reality. I've been a fan of Cesaro for around 8 years and it took me almost no time to move away from calling him Claudio.

I had a problem with BD being called Daniel Bryan at first, now it's synonymous with his act - and honestly, it's a better name for fans to chant. Dolph Ziggler sounded like the most ridicioulus wrestler name of all time at first, now it's synonymous with his act - and honestly, it's a much more memorable name than Nick Nemeth. Dean Ambrose sounded like a rice-y desert at first, now it's synonymous with his act - and honestly, it's a much more marketable name than Jon Moxley.

If they had called Punk something along the lines of Brooky Phillips, I'm sure we would've all adjusted in time. :side:

· Banned
3,123 Posts
Cesaro, it's much shorter and easier to say. That said, it does piss me off how they never let guys wrestle under their own names any more.

18,922 Posts
Voted for Claudio, since the Antonio Cesaro name sounds considerably more Italian instead of Swiss, although the Cesaro name has grown on me a little. Ultimately, the man is a fucking boss regardless of using his real name or a company-made one.
1 - 20 of 71 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.