Someone who always takes the opposite opinion.What is a contrarian?
They had an ok match at mania now they're 10 years older and both have had serious injuries mount up since then.How is HHH going to drag it down? They had a pretty damn good match at WM17, I think they've got plenty of chemistry to work with.
So you're basing it off what you saw a DECADE ago?!?!?How is HHH going to drag it down? They had a pretty damn good match at WM17, I think they've got plenty of chemistry to work with.
WM X7 was imo top 3 when it comes to manias and they're match was good, but they might not be bringing it up because it had one of the worst spots ever (chokeslam on to foam padding lol)I’ve said this multiple times already, they are most definitely trying too hard, I get that they are building the match up, no problem but they are just doing too much now. They are really trying to make Triple H more credible then he already is if you get what I’m saying, I’m just not really into this feud at all, ESPECIALLY since WWE are really going to go through with ignoring their Wrestlemania 17 encounter which was one of the most important and unforgettable Mania’s in history.
Oh, but it's OK for people to go nuts over Hulk Hogan at the age 50 wrestling in the main event of Wrestlemania? Or Ric Flair hovering around 60 wrestling HBK at Wrestlemania....So you're basing it off what you saw a DECADE ago?!?!?
it will be terrible but it will be less terrible if Triple H puts his career on the line so that he'll be gone.
Oh and for those who asked:
con·trar·i·an
/kənˈtrɛəriən/ Show Spelled[kuhn-trair-ee-uhn] Show IPA
–noun
a person who takes an opposing view, especially one who rejects the majority opinion, as in economic matters.
Use contrarian in a Sentence
See images of contrarian
Search contrarian on the Web
Origin:
contr(ary) + -arian
Older fans might also react negatively. "Really? Both these guys are still wrestling? WTF?"No. I really don't. To my knowledge this is the only match that is actually going to have 2 legends in it. Yes, I know a lot of people don't like Triple H (I personally love him, lol) but for good or bad he is a legend in this business.
If you haven't been watching in a while or just happened to tune in in the last few weeks or even tonight for that matter, your first thought would be, "Really? Both those guys are still wrestling? Well hell this might be interesting. I think I might buy Wrestlemania this year. Oh and who the hell are these other guys? I might check them out". Ding, ding, ding! You just got a fan back and they may stick around to see what else is happening.
So yeah, my answer is no, I don't honestly think it's being hyped enough. In fact I was checking my twitter tonight and noticed one of my friends say, "Oh SCSA is back? Hmmm. That's interesting". So yeah IMO they need to hype the hell out of their legends for their own sake.
Yeah, that true. I won't deny that. I'm just saying looking at it from a positive angle it makes sense to me to push it. Your right though the negative would be exactly what you mentioned.Older fans might also react negatively. "Really? Both these guys are still wrestling? WTF?"
The feud does seem to feel a bit forced. Would have really helped if HHH were heel. After 2 years of him facing HBK, who was also a face, I really wanted to see Taker up against a big name heel.