Wrestling Forum banner

Superstars ending their career

2578 Views 22 Replies 22 Participants Last post by  Chaotic_Forces
What is the best way?

Dignified exit after realising you are no longer on top form. Putting over your opponent in your final match.
STEVE AUSTIN
SHAWN MICHAELS

Constantly "retiring" before having a "comeback"
RIC FLAIR
HULK HOGAN

Not retiring but generally staying off TV and having matches at occasional big events.
THE ROCK
TRIPLE H

Being screwed in your last match with one company then being forced to retire due to injury with another. Then coming back not being able to wrestle properly but somehow winning a title as a "token gesture".
BRET HART
1 - 20 of 23 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,765 Posts
The dignified exit putting someone over should be every wrestler's ideal exit.

Failing that, retiring as world champion with your last match at wrestlemania. Not bad...though it does nothing for the business.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
10,013 Posts
I hope Taker loses a token match at Extreme Rules, but I'm beginning to think he's only going to wrestle one match a year til he retires and win that one match every time.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,255 Posts
Why is it that people say every legend has to lose to a younger wrestler in their last match? It makes the legend look bad. And what is the young superstar going to brag about? That they beat an old, washed up old wrestler?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
940 Posts
HBK and Austin did it the way it should be done with all major stars: putting over another huge star in a great match at a major pay per view.
 

· Wrestling is better while drinking
Joined
·
2,039 Posts
Bret Hart is a special case. He didn't want to retire, he had a stroke and he had a ton of issues that were still there. If anyone believes anything post stroke was a wrestling match they are nuts. It was unnecessary, but at least he got to put on the gear one last time in front of a crowd. That is only fair to him.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,013 Posts
I like Not retiring but generally staying off TV and having matches at occasional big events.

I like it because then we can see wrestlers like Triple H in matches.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,197 Posts
For me the best way is putting over a younger talent

Obviously Austin and Edge couldn't do that because of their careers finished on health grounds

Shawn Michaels/Ric Flair and Hogan should have put over a young talent in their final match and then stayed retired. Hogan should have had his final match putting over Orton at Summerslam, Flair should have gone out losing to Umaga at Mania 24 and Michaels should have been retired by someone like Sheamus.

As great as the Flair/Michaels and the Undertaker/Michaels matches were I really think they should have ended their careers losing to someone who could actually benefit from getting the win
 

· 100% Straight Fire
Joined
·
2,912 Posts
Easily the dignified route. The Flair/Hogan approach has just led both of those guys to kinda ruin their legacies. Any kids who see their recent matches these days will think they're shit, which they're clearly not. As for The Rock/Triple H, it's a fair enough thing to do, but the company can kinda come to rely on those big names at times, which isn't great because it lets them get away with a weak roster.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
9,964 Posts
The route HBK went. At the time he retired he could still wrestle but he wisely and correctly chose the right time to leave when he was healthy and people still saw him as not only a legend but still one of the best wrestler on the roster.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
751 Posts
Flair I agree is the best. Had the ultimate send off.

I never think injury is the best way as it is forced upon them. I still think we will see Edge back. After HBK and Bret, returns are NEVER impossible, unless they're no longer with us.
 
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top