Both moves are simlar but i just wanted to know which you think looks better more effective and which was better executed?
That, and the fact Austin is one of the most talented of all time, and Orton is a non talented shit head.I prefer the RKO, even though anything to do with Austin will get a vote automatically on here so that will probably get more votes.
i wasnt makinga comparison between austin and orton it was about the moves i would of called the rko the diamond cutter if that would of made you feel better.Please stop making these comparisons to Austin and Orton
There both completely different, one is a psycho, the other, a hick
They both just have quick and over finishers that's were the similarities end
again im not compairing Austin to Orton im talking about the moves this thread had no intention to bring Austin or Orton into it.That, and the fact Austin is one of the most talented of all time, and Orton is a non talented shit head.
Stunner, all the way. I'm not going to be drawn in by a finisher that requires the victim to jump into the move and do most of the work themselves.
thanks mate its all i really wanted someone to tell me what they thought so thanks.RKO, because it came out of no where and you don't expect it, like Sweet Chin Music. The Stunner he kicks them and then you know whats happening. Also, The RKO he doesn't sit, he goes on his back (executor) so it's a farther distance, making it more...lethal? I don't know, my thoughts.
Or maybe we just like the stunner better. I personally feel it is one of the greatest finishers of all time, and happened to be used by one of the greatest wrestlers of all time. The RKO is pretty good in its own respect though. In fact it's the only thing that stops Randy Orton from completely sucking.I prefer the RKO, even though anything to do with Austin will get a vote automatically on here so that will probably get more votes.