It's realistic. These jobber nobodies off the streets should never be able to beat a regular TNA wrestler.On another topic: When will we see a prospect win their match on gutcheck? everybody so far have lost. Are they building it up being very special to win the match you get on gutcheck and therefor building it up for the one winning getting a huge push?
That's ok, Robbie T never had any to begin with.I heard it too. It's pretty embarrassing when a crowd chants steroids at a wrestler. It immediately kills his character/credibility.
'Cause when someone comes from Strikeforce and kicks the ass of someone in UFC, the UFC automatically loses all credibility. Amirite? :gun::gun::gun:what does that say about your roster
It's realistic. These jobber nobodies off the streets should never be able to beat a regular TNA wrestler.
That's ok, Robbie T never had any to begin with.
It's not "realistic" for TNA to continually hire people who can't do their job, i.e. win a match. It would be understandable if it happened on occasion on the basis that the person has a lot of potential, but so far everyone they gave a contract to haven't won their match. What does it say about a company if they keep hiring nobodies off the street that can't do their job?If an independant wrestler or guy off the street beats a guy on your roster, what does that say about your roster
Bingo.'Cause when someone comes from Strikeforce and kicks the ass of someone in UFC, the UFC automatically loses all credibility. Amirite? :gun::gun::gun:
I agree with you on this one. They look pretty much like nobodies if they come and lose. If they really want someone to get in strong and get over with fans somewhat, he needs that win on gutcheck.It's not "realistic" for TNA to continually hire people who can't do their job, i.e. win a match. It would be understandable if it happened on occasion on the basis that the person has a lot of potential, but so far everyone they gave a contract to haven't won their match. What does it say about a company if they keep hiring nobodies off the street that can't do their job?
Having Indy wrestlers defeat their TNA 'Superstars' makes the company look less prestigious. TNA is supposed to be the elite organization for all professional wrestlers to aim towards working for, so they have to promote their roster with the same prestige.Did I hear steroids chants under Hardy vs Robbie T´s match?
I almost peed ma pants, that was so funny.
On another topic: When will we see a prospect win their match on gutcheck? everybody so far have lost. Are they building it up being very special to win the match you get on gutcheck and therefor building it up for the one winning getting a huge push?
If an indy talent can't beat a jobber like Robbie E then he doesn't deserve a contract. Not hiring the best makes TNA less prestigious.Having Indy wrestlers defeat their TNA 'Superstars' makes the company look less prestigious. TNA is supposed to be the elite organization for all professional wrestlers to aim towards working for, so they have to promote their roster with the same prestige.
I do think they are building for an an Indy Talent to go over. If they're the caliber of a Joe, Aries etc, then it makes sense to make an exception to the rule. It would have to be a clearly exceptional talent for it to work though.
I'll use a boxing analogy. A young fighter with a good amateur career transitions to the pros. After a few fights he gets a call to appear on a televised under-card. With little prep-time he takes on a fighter who although limited, has appeared on a number of televised events, including fights with multiple-time world champions. The youngster has faced stiff opposition in the amateurs, but has never had millions watching or fought in such difficult circumstances. So he makes a rookie error in the ring and gets dropped for it.If an indy talent can't beat a jobber like Robbie E then he doesn't deserve a contract. Not hiring the best makes TNA less prestigious.
Yeah what i was thinkin too. That would make the guy so over if they had just this one guy or so making it.Having Indy wrestlers defeat their TNA 'Superstars' makes the company look less prestigious. TNA is supposed to be the elite organization for all professional wrestlers to aim towards working for, so they have to promote their roster with the same prestige.
I do think they are building for an an Indy Talent to go over. If they're the caliber of a Joe, Aries etc, then it makes sense to make an exception to the rule. It would have to be a clearly exceptional talent for it to work though.
The preception is that he is only there due to his size that kills his character/credibility.I heard it too. It's pretty embarrassing when a crowd chants steroids at a wrestler. It immediately kills his character/credibility.
You really didn't need to use an analogy for something most people already know. My point is not every gut check talent can have the Rocky Balboa story. Some of them have to win if they're going to receive contracts. We've had like 6 so far and none of them have won. At least one should have won against someone like Robbie E with a schoolboy. TNA should be using gut check to find the best of the best, and the fact that most of these guys are lower than jobbers doesn't make the company look good. I can't wait for a year or two from now when everyone will look back and see how much of a failure gut check is.I'll use a boxing analogy. A young fighter with a good amateur career transitions to the pros. After a few fights he gets a call to appear on a televised under-card. With little prep-time he takes on a fighter who although limited, has appeared on a number of televised events, including fights with multiple-time world champions. The youngster has faced stiff opposition in the amateurs, but has never had millions watching or fought in such difficult circumstances. So he makes a rookie error in the ring and gets dropped for it.
Despite losing he manages to get up and fight bravely, showing great potential in a decision defeat, whilst making an exciting fight in the process. Of course the television want more of him, so they sign him up to another deal, with cash advances to get him into the best possible condition. This guy in five years becomes a monster prospect and future world champion.
For TNA the point is that they have all the elite talent in the world. Gutcheck was designed to look for potential, that with the right training and financial backing could become an elite talent. In Kayfabe land, Even the pussy members of the TNA roster are a step ahead of anything, due to facing better quality wrestlers and having all the right infrastructure to maximize their ability.
The only time a Gutcheck wrestler should win is when he is something of a prodigy, aka Floyd or Oscar. A once in the lifetime talent that can handle the immediate push to the top.
Gut Check was never about finding the best of the best.You really didn't need to use an analogy for something most people already know. My point is not every gut check talent can have the Rocky Balboa story. Some of them have to win if they're going to receive contracts. We've had like 6 so far and none of them have won. At least one should have won against someone like Robbie E with a schoolboy. TNA should be using gut check to find the best of the best, and the fact that most of these guys are lower than jobbers doesn't make the company look good. I can't wait for a year or two from now when everyone will look back and see how much of a failure gut check is.