Joined
·
8,563 Posts
The Miz is a good wrestler.
I challenge this Forum to come up with one or more opinions concerning wrestling that you that stand by, but that the majority would disagree with you and/or criticise you for..
Now I don't expect to get many responses to this, but i'm curious to see who can step up and be brutally honest.. and please, keep the discussions civil and respectful.
Here's a few answers from me:
I think PG is great for business.
I think Russo and Ferrera are underrated.
I think that Jim Cornette and Dave Meltzer are overrated.
Well, yes and no. You'd be surprised at the amount of people claiming that PG is killing the business, or that the WWE would become huge again if they only brought back their edginess. While I think that some have legit points, I have others to indicate that doing this right now might not be the best time.Business-wise I don't think anyone would disagree, its everything else that comes with it, such as the product itself.
As for my own outrageous opinion... Kane is better than The Undertaker.
well how "huge" was it post aeWell, yes and no. You'd be surprised at the amount of people claiming that PG is killing the business, or that the WWE would become huge again if they only brought back their edginess. While I think that some have legit points, I have others to indicate that doing this right now might not be the best time.
and i think cm punk is the true worst wrestler of all time. he has a weak ass finisher, he throws weak ass kicks that look like they have no impact, and he has a botch in every match he's in.Jeff Hardy is the worst wrestler ever. I don't mean ever like how everybody uses the word ever "oh, this guy cut the worst promo...EVER!", I mean....ever. EVER. In the history of the business. Bad to a level that nobody could get to even if they aspired to be that bad. Dead serious. I mean guys who just started are better ever.