Should WWE split both the major titles again?
7340
96
i am talking about wwe and whc belt
a big yes from my side . players like cesaro,bnb,dolph,cody and other young talent won't able to win wwe whc title in their whole career but if both title split back then they can al test get whc title
your thoughts ?
a big yes from my side . players like cesaro,bnb,dolph,cody and other young talent won't able to win wwe whc title in their whole career but if both title split back then they can al test get whc title
your thoughts ?
1 - 20 of 97 Posts
Joined
·
3,892 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
Yes but only if legitimate guys win the WHC, that means guys like Brock Lesnar (who could make it relevant again) or John Cena (not a fan of his but him having the WHC title could work).
P.S. And yes Bray Wyatt could be a great WHC champ.
Yes but only if legitimate guys win the WHC, that means guys like Brock Lesnar (who could make it relevant again) or John Cena (not a fan of his but him having the WHC title could work).
P.S. And yes Bray Wyatt could be a great WHC champ.
Joined
·
864 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
I respectfully disagree, purely because it would cluster fuck an already poor title picture in general.
If they can't manage to put story lines together for the IC, US and TT championships at the moment, how will they cope with another belt.
YES I know it's the WHC belt and it has more meaning but it furthers my point that the secondary belts would get squashed back even further, which has been the problem for years before the unification.
Only possibility would be a brand split, which 90% would agree won't work either.
I respectfully disagree, purely because it would cluster fuck an already poor title picture in general.
If they can't manage to put story lines together for the IC, US and TT championships at the moment, how will they cope with another belt.
YES I know it's the WHC belt and it has more meaning but it furthers my point that the secondary belts would get squashed back even further, which has been the problem for years before the unification.
Only possibility would be a brand split, which 90% would agree won't work either.
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
YES. I don't want to see 3 new world champions in the next 20 fucking years.
If they split the titles again, guys like Bray Wyatt and Dean Ambrose would actually get something out of being on this roster. They're doomed right now.
*sigh* They're sticking with one title. If only Wyatt had found himself as a performer a few years earlier. To think Jack Swagger will go down in history as world champion and he won't, it's blood boiling.
YES. I don't want to see 3 new world champions in the next 20 fucking years.
If they split the titles again, guys like Bray Wyatt and Dean Ambrose would actually get something out of being on this roster. They're doomed right now.
*sigh* They're sticking with one title. If only Wyatt had found himself as a performer a few years earlier. To think Jack Swagger will go down in history as world champion and he won't, it's blood boiling.
Joined
·
2,484 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
How many threads are we gonna get on this. The answer is no.
How many threads are we gonna get on this. The answer is no.
Joined
·
1,554 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
Really it comes down to this: either you agree with Pyro and think that the only way to be considered a legitimate star is to win a world title, or you don't. I like only having one title, but the argument for the other side is a legitimate one.
Really it comes down to this: either you agree with Pyro and think that the only way to be considered a legitimate star is to win a world title, or you don't. I like only having one title, but the argument for the other side is a legitimate one.
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
IWC at its best again! For many years they said how the brand extension should be abolished and the world titles unified and now that they should split again. fpalm The brand extension worked back in 2002-2004 when both brands had great talent in the company and coming from WCW and ECW.
IWC at its best again! For many years they said how the brand extension should be abolished and the world titles unified and now that they should split again. fpalm The brand extension worked back in 2002-2004 when both brands had great talent in the company and coming from WCW and ECW.
Joined
·
223 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
Without the brand split, 2 world titles is unnecessary.
Let's be honest, the WHC was a mere secondary title, and having two world championships damages the prestige of both anyhow.
The best thing they can do is elevate the Intercontinental Championship and make it a big deal again, like it was when such guys as Jericho/Benoit and HBK/Ramon would go to war over it.
P.S. I think the Intercontinental championship is supposed to be the 2nd most prestigious title currently, but it still feels equal to the US Championship (as in, they both feel equally unimportant right now).
Without the brand split, 2 world titles is unnecessary.
Let's be honest, the WHC was a mere secondary title, and having two world championships damages the prestige of both anyhow.
The best thing they can do is elevate the Intercontinental Championship and make it a big deal again, like it was when such guys as Jericho/Benoit and HBK/Ramon would go to war over it.
P.S. I think the Intercontinental championship is supposed to be the 2nd most prestigious title currently, but it still feels equal to the US Championship (as in, they both feel equally unimportant right now).
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
I sure as hell didn't say that, don't speak for everybody. The IWC isn't a hive mind.
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
They'd have to make a new belt for his waist then. :lmao
Joined
·
13,867 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
I would only advocate the return of a second world title if there were a brand extension. Otherwise, there is absolutely no point in having two world championships.
I get that some of the guys like Cody Rhodes, Dolph Ziggler, Bray Wyatt etc may suffer because with only one world title there is a far smaller chance (if any at all) of them ever winning the world title, but even so; in the last few years winning the World Heavyweight Championship didn't really mean you were the world champion, because it was almost universally accepted that the WWE Champion was the true world champion of the company.
I would only advocate the return of a second world title if there were a brand extension. Otherwise, there is absolutely no point in having two world championships.
I get that some of the guys like Cody Rhodes, Dolph Ziggler, Bray Wyatt etc may suffer because with only one world title there is a far smaller chance (if any at all) of them ever winning the world title, but even so; in the last few years winning the World Heavyweight Championship didn't really mean you were the world champion, because it was almost universally accepted that the WWE Champion was the true world champion of the company.
Joined
·
1,033 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
I miss the brand extension. We'd get better matches and a lot more wrestlers would get the spotlight.
I miss the brand extension. We'd get better matches and a lot more wrestlers would get the spotlight.
Joined
·
560 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
I voted Yes! because I'd like to see the titles split and I'd also like to see a brand split again.
However you don't need it to be a title match to be interested in the feud or the matches. Look at Evolution vs Shield, no titles, but I'm invested in it.
I voted Yes! because I'd like to see the titles split and I'd also like to see a brand split again.
However you don't need it to be a title match to be interested in the feud or the matches. Look at Evolution vs Shield, no titles, but I'm invested in it.
Joined
·
3,756 Posts
Re: Should WWE split back both the major titles
Would be better (more chances for top guy) but then what was the fucking point of the unification? The only reason I can see for it is for Daniel Bryan holding both world titles, but when someone else gets the belts I don't know.
Though Orton wore those belts with such GOATness :lol
Would be better (more chances for top guy) but then what was the fucking point of the unification? The only reason I can see for it is for Daniel Bryan holding both world titles, but when someone else gets the belts I don't know.
Though Orton wore those belts with such GOATness :lol
1 - 20 of 97 Posts
