Wrestling Forum banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
33,697 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
What was your take on wrestling matches having time limits? Personally, i liked it. For example in the old WCW, the announcers would remind the fans there was say "5 minutes left" in the match...and it would really make the matchup feel a bit more intense.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
16,529 Posts
For some matches it would work... but title matches should never have limits to me and I never, ever want to see another time limit draw in my life again. I had enough of those before I hit 10 years old to last a lifetime <_<

I think the only good title time limit scenario is an iron man match... that is one where, if you build it in that a draw is as good as a loss for the challenger, and have that final 3 or 4 minutes with a flurry... that is when it can work. But having time limits all over like the days of old.. that is one thing from the past I am glad is pretty much gone.

As for the other things mentioned above.. why in the hell did they stop the pat downs or full announcements? They added a depth to the matches that might not be a big deal, but when it's pointed out you notice... "o yeah... I miss that.". I think it would be cool if we get some old school heel or something, maybe Bo Dallas playing the heel that thinks he's the greatest face ever, and have him point to the opponent and order the ref to pat him down to make sure he is playing fair. Or a devious heel that does it to get a cheap shot in.
 

· A wallaby? Well it's like a kangaroo but smaller.
Joined
·
18,955 Posts
It would definitely stop things like what Shawn did at Wrestlemania 10, that said, look how good that match became but still.

I think yes and no, yes cause of the above but no because we'd all know that the match was going to end soon when it got nearer the time limit, it would also leave it open to so many draw matches which I think a lot of people wouldn't be too keen on.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
31 Posts
What was your take on wrestling matches having time limits? Personally, i liked it. For example in the old WCW, the announcers would remind the fans there was say "5 minutes left" in the match...and it would really make the matchup feel a bit more intense.
I completely agree, but then again not much about the WWE these days makes any sense from what i have seen (i admit tho that i stopped watching in 2003 and only really check back in around WM). From what ive seen of today's product, there are practically no rules in the ring and the referee's seem to serve almost no purpose anymore. I remember a time when after a match was done the bell would always ring if a brawl or something broke out and a horde of 'officials' and other referee's would come storming down and try to separate everyone. I also remember when wrestlers would get 'fined' for pushing around or punching a referee or for consistently braking rules (kayfabe, of course)

So many small details like these that made pro-wrestling seem like 'wrestling' have been scrapped.

Nowadays you have things like Brock Lesnar beating on Big Show with a chair for what seemed like forever and nobody thinks to come down and stop him, fine him or suspend him.

To borrow a line from Kevin Nash, there's just no 'rhyme or reason' to it all (wrestling) anymore.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
67 Posts
Heh, you know what? I don't think I've really thought about time limits in wrestling for a very long time.

I don't really have a strong opinion on the matter one way or another, I suppose - but I don't really see the concept coming back in the long run. It's another one of the antiquated things that we have to look back on.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
867 Posts
I always found the constant time reminders annoying and the time limits annoying too. Led to so many time limit draws that weren't that satisfying to me. I remember the Rock saying back in the day he believes wrestling fans want a winner and a loser. I agree with that.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,657 Posts
When done right, going right up against the time limit worked great. Example for me is the first Clash of Champions, when Flair and Sting went the full 45 minutes. When Sting clamped the Scorpion Deathlock on Flair and you hear the countdown and wonder whether Flair will give up or not. It made for great drama.
 

· Likes wrestling....
Joined
·
14,863 Posts
Time Limits should be gone with very few exceptions IMO from a logic standpoint, kayfabe is a thing of the past. In an era where the audience knows it's scripted it feels irrational unless they are just trying to build a better story. In that case, like with Superclash 1, it helped along the rivalry. In days of kayfabe it made a lot of sense and we got a steady diet of these, especially so neither guy lost any heat.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,222 Posts
Time Limits should be gone with very few exceptions IMO from a logic standpoint, kayfabe is a thing of the past. In an era where the audience knows it's scripted it feels irrational unless they are just trying to build a better story. In that case, like with Superclash 1, it helped along the rivalry. In days of kayfabe it made a lot of sense and we got a steady diet of these, especially so neither guy lost any heat.
My first instinct was "Yeah, I wish they'd bring time limits back," but thinking about this, knowing that it's pre-determined it just feels like a copout or the writers got lazy when there's a time limit draw.

I think that, in specific instances, it's okay. For instance, if there was a Television Title today, it would be an accepted part of a TV Title match that it could end one of four ways: Champ wins, Challenger wins, dq/double countout, or a time limit draw. Same thing goes for iron man matches. It's an accepted part going into that match that it could end in a draw, or that it will end when the clock runs out.

I don't know if I ever liked it with the NWA/WCW World Title. It had its moments (Sting/Flair at the Clash, most notably), but to invest 60 minutes in a match where the champion would always retain never really worked for me. Mostly because they did that finish far too many times. Sometimes the journey was worth it, but the destination was always a disappointment.

But, it worked great for the TV Title. I seriously wouldn't mind seeing that back or some variation of it. Maybe they have a title where it's a 15-minute Iron Man Match, or a 10 minute Beat-The-Clock Champion.

It's all about expectations.


EDIT: Another place where a time limit draw works pretty well is in a tournament setting, like King of the Ring, where the result of the match actually effects another match on the show.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,348 Posts
I wouldn't mind seeing the occasional time limit draw. It's a nice way to build up a feud between "even" wrestlers, or for a heel champion to escape by the skin of his teeth. It would also come off as "new" to younger fans since it hasn't been done in so long. You just can't overuse it the way some promotions did in the past.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
1,620 Posts
I will never forget the horrible viewing of Akeem vs Big John Studd. I cannot remember how long it went for but no, no more time limits
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Wrestling 1

· Registered
Joined
·
9,209 Posts
I always found the constant time reminders annoying and the time limits annoying too. Led to so many time limit draws that weren't that satisfying to me. I remember the Rock saying back in the day he believes wrestling fans want a winner and a loser. I agree with that.
I know fans online hate this saying, but you can't always give the fans what they want. Things need to get built up and the more ways the company can do this instead of cheap heat cop outs the better I say.

I wouldn't mind seeing the occasional time limit draw. It's a nice way to build up a feud between "even" wrestlers, or for a heel champion to escape by the skin of his teeth. It would also come off as "new" to younger fans since it hasn't been done in so long. You just can't overuse it the way some promotions did in the past.
Yeah I think it's arrogant to assume everyone views wrestling as a smark. That has never been the case. Somethings do need to be brought back so the product can seem fresh to some people. Plus as mentioned in the thread the no rhyme or reason has to cut out because it causes disjointed story telling.

For instance in all of this Daniel Bryan and Authority stuff where the hell is Vince Mcmahon lol. Wasn't he in dispute with HHH and Steph a few months ago lol. Now he just allows them to do whatever lol.

Of course, continuity writers get fired for bringing up these inconsistencies.
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top