Wrestling Forum banner

Raw Rating (03/28/2011) - highest viewership since June 2009

7828 Views 75 Replies 50 Participants Last post by  Tronnik
Actual rating was a 3.81 rating, but with an average of ~6.0m it's the highest viewership since June 2009. Hour 1 had a 3.56 rating, Hour 2 had a 4.06 rating.

More importantly for WWE, though 3.0m people in the 18-49 demo watched, the highest since April 2007.

Source: TedOnTV and NoDQ.com on Twitter.
1 - 20 of 76 Posts
Wow, I was expecting 4.0. It's still really good though.
Not bad, overall it was a very good going home show.
6 million viewers and people are saying not bad? Come the fuck on! That's awesome. I think this show along with HBK/HHH/Taker and Rock/Miz/Cena just might have done the trick.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Good rating. If it wasn't for The Rock though, I think the rating would have been around 3.4
Thats a good rating. WWE wont get an overall rating of 4 for a very very long time. Maybe never again. The last hour was the most watched and anticipated. Rock is surely a ratings factor, like him or not.
honestly I am not surprised. I woulda been shocked if it pulled anything in the 3's... Twitter was blowing up with RAW/Rock stuff last night and one thing that shocked my cynical jaded self was even celebs was tweeting about the show.. NOT just for "The Rock" but during the Taker promo they were considerably pro-undertaker which made me laugh amidst my shock

celebs were just like us marking out during the 'Tude Era :) haha
6 million viewers and people are saying not bad? Come the fuck on! That's awesome. I think this show along with HBK/HHH/Taker and Rock/Miz/Cena just might have done the trick.
Lmao, I am not bashing it or anything, I said it was a very good going home show.
It got 6m people for the 2nd hour?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
btw in case people wonder why i keep mentioning twitter blowing up and celebs talking about WWE it's because twitter is a pulse and seeing that while the show was going on last night showed point blank

the world was watching

:) so yeah, nowhere near shocked the ratings were good
4.1 in the second half .. wow

The Rock did indeed bring it
Great viewing, 2nd hour getting over 4 is good since the last itme rock was on raw it was the over run that got over 4, think both hours were still 3. something.
Problem is everyone knows nothing of note happens in the first hour and is always an opening promo follwed by a jobber match, then an interview or something before the real deal starts on the hour. Hour -> is where you wanna watch and people do. This is why raw probably wont get ratings over 3.8 these days unless they shake it up and start putting on more must see stuff before the hour and have something must see for the end to eep them tuned in. Instead of keeping it all for the last 30 - 40 minutes of the show.
honestly I am not surprised. I woulda been shocked if it pulled anything in the 3's... Twitter was blowing up with RAW/Rock stuff last night and one thing that shocked my cynical jaded self was even celebs was tweeting about the show.. NOT just for "The Rock" but during the Taker promo they were considerably pro-undertaker which made me laugh amidst my shock

celebs were just like us marking out during the 'Tude Era :) haha
Which 'celebs'?
btw to the more observant out there..

was the Taker/HHH/HBK promo part of the 1st hour or the 2nd..?

I definitely think it helped not just attracting but keeping viewers tuned in, that promo was good as hell
^^^^hhh/taker promo was start of second hour. takers music hit like 5 min before 10.

6m viewers is incredible really.
btw to the more observant out there..

was the Taker/HHH/HBK promo part of the 1st hour or the 2nd..?

I definitely think it helped not just attracting but keeping viewers tuned in, that promo was good as hell

sky planner said it went from about the hour mark to 81 minutes (when the rock/miz/cena picture popped up and i FFd through it and the following advert)
6 million tuned in for 2nd half of the show, Rock done the biz.
1 - 20 of 76 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top