Wrestling Forum banner

1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,724 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
People say they’re sick of Roman always being champion, but the stats don’t support this view.

2015:

1st reign: 5 minutes 15 seconds
2nd reign: 6 weeks

2016:
3rd reign: 2 months

2018:
1st Universal reign: 2 months

Unbelievably, Roman’s cumulative championship reigns have lasted for less than 6 months.

To put that in perspective, that’s 11 days more than Jinder Mahal, about a month less than Daniel Bryan, a year less than AJ Styles, and about the same as Shaemus or The Miz. Roman is less successful than Kurt Angle was during the Attitude Era.

In the last 3 years, he’s held the title for less than 3 months.

Interestingly, when he vacated the title due to leukaemia (despite Meltzer saying it was a work) he said when he comes back “it won’t be about titles or being on top”... but Vince never replayed that line in the million replays.

This suggests to me that Roman doesn’t want the title.

Along with the Moxley comments about Roman hating being forced to say the “sufferin’ succotash” line, maybe Roman is sick of working closely with Vince? He’s been rewarded more than most, but in other ways, he’s been damaged and harmed by Vince’s creative more than anyone. Why would he want that spot?

All things considered, what should Roman’s future title picture look like?
 

·
HEADBANGA
Joined
·
22,431 Posts
People are sick of Roman being da face of the company, unfavorably maineventing all those manias. He's obviously was booked the top guy but rarely held the title. A weird bit of booking.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,096 Posts
It is rather unfortunate that he hasn't had a long enough reign to let it all play out. It's kinda his fault for getting busted in 2016, though.

And it was dumb to take the belt off of Reigns in the Rumble that year. HHH really didn't need a reign. You can have a strong enough heel built up to challenge the babyface champion. Only unimaginative people default to "The Chase" and think it's the only story in wrestling.

Orton challenging HHH at WM25 and Andre challenging Hogan immediately come to mind as heels challenging faces in feuds that worked (despite the stupid finish at WM25). It's really not that hard.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,302 Posts
People are sick of Roman being da face of the company, unfavorably maineventing all those manias. He's obviously was booked the top guy but rarely held the title. A weird bit of booking.
All you need is to look at the context of all those title reigns.

His first title reign he lost after being cashed into by Sheamus, won it back pretty much immediately after, only lost it after having to put it on the line against 29 other people, only to win it back in the main event of Wrestlemania. Just because he wasn't the champion the whole way doesn't mean he wasn't the top guy the whole time.

He only lost the title to Rollins because he got hit by the wellness policy test, then the title went to Ambrose to be the top title on Smackdown. Don't worry about Roman since he now has the UC to fight for.

Roman was still in his depush phase so he was in the midcard for a while, and they were super interested in Balor and Rollins at the time. This was the only period where I felt like they didn't have much plans for Reigns, until mania season came along and suddenly out of no where Reigns vs Taker was booked and main evented Mania, signalling the restart of his push.

From then on, Vince was dead set on having Roman be the one to beat Brock for the title so cue Brock destroying everyone for a year and a half until Roman comes in and unseats Brock. Only for the cancer to show up forcing him to relinquish it.

He was always primed for the world title for most of the time since his first world title win. The only time he ever lost it fairly was to Seth, and Seth was returning hot at the time while Roman got busted by the wellness policy. Had that not happened and had Roman had not gotten cancer, I'd guess you'd see he'd be having much longer title reigns,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ham and Egger

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,040 Posts
Honestly, I kinda feel bad for Roman. Instead of getting over or not on his own Vince shoved a rocket up his butt and propelled him to the top. Many of the fans rejected him because he was Vince's new toy.

Roman never really had a chance to be..........Joe
and see if that worked or not.
 

·
HEADBANGA
Joined
·
22,431 Posts
All you need is to look at the context of all those title reigns.

His first title reign he lost after being cashed into by Sheamus, won it back pretty much immediately after, only lost it after having to put it on the line against 29 other people, only to win it back in the main event of Wrestlemania. Just because he wasn't the champion the whole way doesn't mean he wasn't the top guy the whole time.

He only lost the title to Rollins because he got hit by the wellness policy test, then the title went to Ambrose to be the top title on Smackdown. Don't worry about Roman since he now has the UC to fight for.

Roman was still in his depush phase so he was in the midcard for a while, and they were super interested in Balor and Rollins at the time. This was the only period where I felt like they didn't have much plans for Reigns, until mania season came along and suddenly out of no where Reigns vs Taker was booked and main evented Mania, signalling the restart of his push.

From then on, Vince was dead set on having Roman be the one to beat Brock for the title so cue Brock destroying everyone for a year and a half until Roman comes in and unseats Brock. Only for the cancer to show up forcing him to relinquish it.

He was always primed for the world title for most of the time since his first world title win. The only time he ever lost it fairly was to Seth, and Seth was returning hot at the time while Roman got busted by the wellness policy. Had that not happened and had Roman had not gotten cancer, I'd guess you'd see he'd be having much longer title reigns,
Thanks for the refresher. I wonder if they're gearing up for another Reigns title win that will be the long reign they've been trying to do for a while now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,463 Posts
Straw man argument. There’s never been an overwhelming complaint of Roman being champion. The complaints have been about Roman sucking up all of the oxygen and being in the wrestlemania main event several years in a row.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,577 Posts
Roman Reigns is a top talent. The reason why people don't get behind him is that there are several other guys at his level or even better in terms of how they connect with the fans. WWE overemphasized on Reigns for the last 5 years at the expense of making everyone else on the roster look like dolts.

This certainly hasn't helped Roman nor the brand.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,086 Posts
Roman Reigns is a top talent. The reason why people don't get behind him is that there are several other guys at his level or even better in terms of how they connect with the fans. WWE overemphasized on Reigns for the last 5 years at the expense of making everyone else on the roster look like dolts.

This certainly hasn't helped Roman nor the brand.
No he is NOT, and that´s really the problem. They sacrificed everyone and everything to make it LOOK like he´s a top talent.
 

·
a Stupid Idea from Bad Creative
Joined
·
24,745 Posts
That's a gross oversimplification bordering on trolling.

And don't pretend you don't know what people's issue with Roman really is, it's been discussed at length for years now.
This. People are sick of Reigns being featured so much on the shows. Being champion has fuck all to do with that.

#BeBetter

From my personal view the product has gotten so bad and this Wild Card BS has made it worse and at this point I watch so little of the product I really don't care who you put the belts on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,577 Posts
No he is NOT, and that´s really the problem. They sacrificed everyone and everything to make it LOOK like he´s a top talent.
I know. That's the only way they know how to book their product. Castrating others at the expense of one guy and then back pedaling a little bit but not really showing any conviction to move forward or create any real stars.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,970 Posts
Reigns vs Bryan is SD's money feud anyways so I wouldn't mind Reigns as champion. Considering Kofi is still over now, would be great to turn Reigns heel and have him beat him for the title..and then build towards a Bryan vs Reigns feud with Bryan turning face again..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,006 Posts
so after being in 4 wrestlemania main events in a row which he won 2 of them defeating Triple H AND Undertaker, winning every possible midcard titles, winning the royal rumble 2015 and being featured in the final 3 in rumbles matches for 5 years straight + becoming a 3 time world champion in under 6 months and defeating brock lesnar at summerslam 2018 to become a 4 time world champion, winning 95% of his feuds and despite the brand split appearing on both raw and smackdown since the wild card rule YOU TELL ME THAT WE NEED TO PUT THE TITLE ON ROMAN?

It wont do any favours to Roman, the title or the product.
Defeating Taker at Mania is reason enough to not be champion for atleast 5 years since you are allready above anything. You cant get any bigger.
The title win is just going to be another accomplishment nothing more.

They should focus how to make Roman Mr.Mitb & the 24/7 champion since these are the only thing left to accomplish.

Let him feud with the Elias,Corbins & McIntyres. Thats the best thing they can do with him at the moment.

Just look who gets more air time and attention.
Roman is more featured in the product than the world titles and the wrestlers who are holding these titles. so why does he need the title atm?

but then again they might pull a Cena 2009 where the title switches every 2-3 weeks to make Roman a 7 time world champion till 2020.
i expect everything from vince nowadays.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top