After watching the latest episodes of NxT and RAW I noticed all the "WWE has come under attack" promos, what exactly has happened?
Exactly, people who oppose her are taking incidents that happened in the Attitude and Ruthless Aggression Eras and trying to give the impression that this is what WWE is like, thereby damaging Linda by association. While they are not being strictly honest in their tactics, it is nevertheless true that during this period she was indeed the CEO of the company and did nothing to stop it from happening, instead being perfectly happy to let the money roll in; many of the subsequent changes to WWE have nothing to do with wanting to do the right thing and everything to do with her political ambitions. This is something I always look for come election time, can I see evidense that a candidate has modified the political views publicly in order to appear more electable? If the answer is yes then I do not vote for them.Linda McMahon is standing for some politics position in Connecticut and her opponents are using WWE against her by saying how bad it is for kids etc. So they're trying to make the WWE fans "stand up for WWE" and tell the world what a great product it is.