During an interview on the MackMania podcast, WWE's Paul Heyman was asked his thoughts on the WWE Biography series that is airing on A&E and why he chose to be
It doesn’t need the title, but it’s tricky because I feel Roman should face Rock at mania and it would also put over someone huge if they take both titles from Reigns at a mania show.Rock vs Roman doesn't need a title involved
Well I think they will be able to get one of the titles off him before mania. The trick will be the other oneIt doesn’t need the title, but it’s tricky because I feel Roman should face Rock at mania and it would also put over someone huge if they take both titles from Reigns at a mania show.
maybe he pulls double duty for nights 1 and 2
Lose the titles night 1, then face Rock night 2
Holy shit, you know that was a joke thread, right?? Oh my god, you bought that??? You stand alone thereSays the person who started the thread "Veer needs to get some durable sneakers".
Where in my post did I say this was dumb?I wasn't debating whether it was a joke or not..... I do know however, it was a dumb thread.
I figure there’s a reason they keep dropping hints lately along with the fact his schedule is cleared for the couple of months around Mania time.Only if non-title. Would be pointless for Roman to continue holding the title, unless you want him to mow over Drew and then ignore Cody’s return, both of which would be idiotic.
Also, I’m still convinced this isn’t happening. Rock is 50 and is composed of show muscle for movies. The dude tore a bunch of muscles last time he wrestled a decade ago, and he’s as busy now as he was then.