Wrestling Forum banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

14,118 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Cole is annoying and knows only a small amount about wrestling.

King is boring as hell, uninterested and uninteresting and magically doesn't know much about wrestling either.

Striker is too pompous and cocky because he does know something about wrestling, and he makes every match boring by over-analysing everything.

Mathews tries to commentate but still knows jack all about wrestling.

Regal knows wrestling but is too unemotional.

Stanford is retarded.

I always hear people giving shit to Cole because he's annoying (though it's toned down) and King because he's boring and doesn't care anymore (fair game, it's true), but then say Striker's good simply 'cause he knows what he's talking about, yet he's more boring than King...

Why does WWE not have a decent commentator on at least one show?
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.