Joined
·
19,895 Posts
Wondering what many think was the most unjust release, or releases, of 2010. There were quite a few people released throughout the year, some who asked to be, many more who apparently didn't, but who sticks out to you as plainly "unjust" compared to the majority of the releases?
For me, I think I would have to say Luke Gallows. The guy is still very young, in his mid-twenties, was turning into a decent big man style worker, proved he could play an important role within a stable and seemed to have a fairly significant "upside." I'm still not sure why they released him with a bunch of comparatively broken-down guys who were either in their mid- or late-30s. I hope he gets another chance. It's not his fault the SES angle disintegrated in ugly fashion, it was WWE's, but it seems as though he was punished for it. "Unjust."
What do you think? Who jumps out to you?
For me, I think I would have to say Luke Gallows. The guy is still very young, in his mid-twenties, was turning into a decent big man style worker, proved he could play an important role within a stable and seemed to have a fairly significant "upside." I'm still not sure why they released him with a bunch of comparatively broken-down guys who were either in their mid- or late-30s. I hope he gets another chance. It's not his fault the SES angle disintegrated in ugly fashion, it was WWE's, but it seems as though he was punished for it. "Unjust."
What do you think? Who jumps out to you?