Wrestling Forum banner

1 - 20 of 63 Posts

·
Friends Come And Go,Banners Hang Forever
Joined
·
25,686 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
faraday said:
"I want to mod a mafia game, what do I do?"

First of all you should probably have played a sufficient number of Mafia games to know what you're doing. If you try to mod without understanding how the game actually works then you're just being silly.

Let's just asusme you've done that. The next step is to pick a theme/gimmick for your game that you can design your setup around.

Let's say you're doing "Movie Mafia". Okay, that's the initial step but you need more than that to get started. In some cases the anti town factions will be obvious (E.g. Team Rocket in pokemon), but here you can have some more creative control. Want a Superhero mafia? Done. Morgan Freeman Movie Mafia? Done. The main thing when creating it is to make sure you get the numbers right.

A rough rule of thumb is that 10:3 is reasonably balanced for a single faction game, with a moderate level of town power. So in an 18 player game with 1 faction you can have around ~4 mafia. 3 very strong mafia, or 4 + a traitor with a lot of town power would also work, but sheer numbers might be two much. It's important to remember that 4 mafia are much harder to lynch and find than 3 -- it just needs one player in the mafia to play well for them to win. I'd use something like 10 town : 3 Mafia, 14 town: 4 Mafia, 17 town: 5 mafia and 20 town: 6 mafia, give or take as a rough guide for single faction games.

A lot depends on your town and mafia power, respectively. We'll get to that later on - but the above numbers are a reasonable place to start.

Hey, but I want two mafia factions? And a serial killer? And a cult!
Okay. Here's the thing, the more anti town factions you add the more luck based the game becomes. (Or at the very least, it requires different skills to play -- so bear that in mind).

In a game with an SK the game itself becomes more unpredictable - the serial killer shooting town every night basically means despite town playing and lynching well they can still lose, fairly easily. But if the SK shoots mafia then the game can end quickly despite the town sucking.

But, hey how is that any different than a vigilante? Well, it's different because the vigilante is part of the town - so him causing huge town damage/positives means he's playing poorly/well. But the SK is a wild card who just needs everyone dead, how generally shitty someone not aligned with you plays determing your chances of winning can be annoying.

Now, imagine it's two scum teams? Well it's amplified. Crosskills (when one scum faction shoots another) can swing the game dramatically (i.e. a town who had no chance of winning can suddenly become likely to win over 2 nightphases without lynching a single scum).

Okay, but I still want to use 2 factions

Okay, well whereas with a single faction game you probably want slightly under 25% (or 25% at max) here you want slightly more with a 2 faction game. In a 28 player game 2 scum factions of 4 seems ideal. (Yeah, that's just around 28%). I think any more than that makes it very hard for town to win. It's better to give them some sort of limited crosskill immunity (to at least one or two) than have 5 on each team and depend on crosskills to win)

Obviously then the more factions you add the weirder and harder to predict things become.

Okay, I've done that. Now I want a town cop, watcher, tracker, doctor, bodyguard, vigilante, masons, gunsmith, hider, commuter, beloved princess and scum to have a godfather, roleblocker, rolecop and framer? Is that good?
r u srs. Okay, the first thing is that more power roles aren't always better. Playing a PR is fun, sure but it's almost better if it's not something that happens all the time. Don't be afraid to use vanilla townies or mafia goons. Surely you can substitute it for weak roles, but really a vanilla townie role shouldn't mean you don't want to play the game. If you need a role to play then perhaps you're missing the point? The game, should if possible, be the thing the game is focused on.

Too many info roles means the game becomes dull, with day phases shorter than night phases consistently.

If you ARE going to give everyone a role make sure of a few things
*That all the scum roles aren't all "obvious" scum roles to counter a cop. Don't be afraid to mix up roles, give scum things that look town, town things that look scum. I mean, okay. Giving scum 2 full vigilantes is taking the piss but giving scum an extra kill isn't the end of the world as long as you balance for it.
.
Similarly roles like rolecop can be useful to town, despite being traditionally scum roles.

The last thing you want is town being far behind and being able to confirm 4 or 5 or 6 people with a massclaim, it smacks of poorly thought out game design.

Okay, so I'm ready?
Uh, not quite. When you're creating your roles you need to figure out how they work with other roles?

So, what result does your rolecop get on your SK? Is that a desirable outcome?
How does your roleblocker work with another roleblocker and they target each other?
Does a gunsmith get a guilty on your serial killer? (Traditionally, no)

You should go through your roles and see if there are any problematic interactions. You can generally tell when something won't work very quickly. Either modify the roles or change it, or drop something -- but don't leave it in. Sure your rolecop probably won't target your SK - but it might? And then it's your fault, and you suck.


So, that role doesn't work as it doesn't match the flavour
Shut the fuck up, seriously. Flavour is fine. Flavour is good. Everyone likes an enjoyable game. You know what's not good? Making your game predictable and obvious. Okay, so what if X doesn't make sense as a rolecop? Not every role needs to 100% correlate with flavour. If it does mafia will have a very hard time justifying their claims. Yes, Die Hard can be a vigilante in movie mafia but not every role needs to be 100% "oh, that's so obvious". That just leads to trouble as a mod and for your scum factions.

Oh, and yes. Use strong safeclaims - or at least mix and match them so mafia aren't left with minor characters/having to forge ahead by themselves.


Things you probably shouldn't do but might anyway!
You don't want to give away game relevant information in your scene.
You don't want to tell someone when they're roleblocked. Just tell them they didn't obtain results. What if it was an ascetic? What if it was some other weird role? Why give your players more information on the roles in the game.
You don't want to interact/chat with the players in your game -- you might let something slip if you post in thread.
If someone calls you a bad mod, let it go and respond post game -- don't respond to them now. It confirms what they're saying has some basis in the current game.
I'll add stuff to this later, but might as well get open now. Other experienced mods should add some stuff.




Take these as suggestions and stuff to do, but don't follow it. Games would be boring if everyone did the same thing so try to add some unique(not retarded) stuff to your game to change it up and try to be creative with game mechanics and roles.
 

·
The Sundance Kid
Joined
·
18,387 Posts
Re: Modding tips

make sure you are familiar with your own roles, especially before doing write-ups. you might embarrass yourself and have someone die who shouldn't have because of their role, ie a twin. and then the game is forever altered.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
8,000 Posts
:lol I sent you that and I still for some reason saw the title and thought you were going to have a go @ me for some reason.


Faradays thing (which I may or may not have slightly adjusted I can't remember ive had the wordpad saved there forever) is good for now but if anything pops into my head I'll be sure to mention it.

I'll really emphasise the strong safe claims thing. sometimes its better to totally ditch flavour too if you don't want people to try and use that as a way to catch people out. like the roles should still kinda correlate to the character but don't just throw something on someone b/c you want it. especially if you can't find a suitable balance for it.

also make sure none of the scum roles are useless and vice versa. like the obvious one is if someones bulletproof at least have some way in which they can be killed by at least one dude.
 

·
Friends Come And Go,Banners Hang Forever
Joined
·
25,686 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
yeah, no broken setup/roles.


Each overpowered roles need a counterbalancing role. bulletproof goes with an unstoppable kill, if town has too many tracking type roles then ninjas work, etc etc.
 

·
Is a Snit Head
Joined
·
22,155 Posts
Seems like good advice.

Especially the part about where multi-scum depends largely on the luck.

I have to disagree about giving people roles. I hate playing as a VT. Like when I see the PM I lose most of my interest in the game when I get the PM. Nothing worse than being a VT. I don't think I'm ever going to put a VT in one of my games again.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,538 Posts
I quite enjoy being a VT. I hate having a power role, I play different and know I'm going to die super early anyway. I don't think it's always a choice between lots of VTs or no VTs. I like to stick lots of x shot roles or roles that are basically useless but not a VT. Some people just want something
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
19,332 Posts
Mods what has been your biggest mistakes in games? I think talking about that will help others.

My last game was decided by POE and I hated that but I think my biggest mistake was giving the GF a one shot lynch immune. I'll never do that again as it only punishes town for lynching scum. I have a few regrets but I think that is the one I felt the worst about.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,538 Posts
Giving full fake claims including Miller fake in my first game.

Also not really a fan of death millers, recruits or scum lynch immunity (or anything more than 1 shot town lynch immunity)

Roles which punish an alignment for doing exactly what they should be doing annoy me.

Biggest mistake with a role I ever saw was either that one where if scum hammered a team mate they didn't die (and were allowed to self hammer... forever) and also probably the time I was literally invincible in a game
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
19,332 Posts
My first game was full of mistakes. First of all I called out everyone that wasn't posting enough in the game other than the one scum member that wasn't posting enough. CP caught that immediately the sly devil he is.

I also made the mistake of picking who made the kill for the scum team when they forgot to do it one particular night and I needed to push the game on. That'll never happen again.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,538 Posts
^Scum not picking someone to perform a kill is annoying as fuck.

You raise a good point about mod interaction though. Mods should try their best to stay out of the game as much as possible. People will have different opinions when it comes to mod mistakes but I've seen quite a few unprompted mod 'confirms'. Best to stick to not interacting with anyone at all in thread
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
19,332 Posts
Agreed, Doc. In my last game I made the mistake of saying, "waiting on one role" or something like that. Never, ever, do that. If you have to do that say something like, "still waiting on roles".
 

·
Friends Come And Go,Banners Hang Forever
Joined
·
25,686 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
also when there's only one scum left, I suggest not ending night before everyone has had a chance to come online. not exactly terrible had to decipher who was online and who wasn't to confirm people. :side:



my biggest hosting mistake was not completely randomizing the roles in my first game. made shepard the godfather and he cost his team EVERYTHING. totally ruined the scum team with that one simple move.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
8,000 Posts
Oh, this is fun.

Everyones first game has some sort of mess. I had a bomb which killed about 4 members of the town (which I drew randomly but that was still awful luck and again shows how badly luck can swing things) which had the town not been on a ridiculous roll in catching scum would've no doubt fucked them up if the game was close. I think I probably overpowered town in that game too but bleh.

I try to keep myself out of my games as much as I can. Unless I'm adding a VC or w/e obv. Exceptions being if I've personally fucked up b/c as shitty as it is to mention stuff it's best to be honest w/ that imo b/c otherwise you're influencing stuff.


Roles which punish an alignment for doing exactly what they should be doing annoy me.
Does this include things like town lynching on day 1 or being punished? b/c I think that's nifty. Not something that should be common but certainly can be fun and encourages discussion at the start. Albeit these do tend to end negatively so I can see that side to the argument. But that comes down ultimately to who is in your game and how they react to it.

also when there's only one scum left, I suggest not ending night before everyone has had a chance to come online. not exactly terrible had to decipher who was online and who wasn't to confirm people
lel I may have done this once in my resident evil game. but i think postage managed to swing the blame onto someone else idk. I also made the mistake of replacing Josh for not posting and forgetting he'd been silenced like a noob.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
8,000 Posts
my biggest hosting mistake was not completely randomizing the roles in my first game. made shepard the godfather and he cost his team EVERYTHING. totally ruined the scum team with that one simple move.

yea sorry for being a failed recruit attempt. Rus gained so much knowledge of our team through his dumb third party :kobe2
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,538 Posts
^I don't have a problem with that

I mean, for example with a death miller, you can lynch scum but it can backfire horribly when you mis-read interactions. On the flip side, if you lynch town and think they're scum then it kinda punishes town twice as hard for a mistake which I also don't really like. Admittedly sometimes it's down to luck and it can go the other way but I prefer flips being genuine.

Same deal with lynch immune scum. You lynch scum but are punished for it. Lynches are town's best weapon and I don't really like making it ineffective. Maybe just personal preference though
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
8,000 Posts
I'd agree with both of those. I know Magic being a death miller in a game of Dan's where I was scum helped massively b/c it made so much of my team look better via interaction w/ him. Lynch immune scum is just annoying. Third party I'd argue maybe for if it's a weak team but again personal preference. Some mods like to be dicks :lol

Lynch immune town only becomes annoying towards endgame in that it's really powerful with how strong lynches are then. Although if you're lynched and claim lynch immune town good luck having people believe that I guess.
 
1 - 20 of 63 Posts
Top