You obviously don't know how this forum works. You're meant to post "OMG he got berried, i'm neva watching raw again"How does getting hit from behind, a sneak attack if you will, hurt Bryan's credibility?
Oh that argument. I tried to adress it, but I guess I didn't do a very good job:How does getting hit from behind, a sneak attack if you will, hurt Bryan's credibility?
I think the best you could have hoped for, in a million years, would have been for Bryan to run down and jump Miz when he was trying to hold the cage door shut. Which would have been cool, but it wasn't a Raw full of cool things.Oh that argument. I tried to adress it, but I guess I didn't do a very good job:
1. It could be so much the sneak attack but how utterly glossed over it was. The same thing happening to Cena or Orton would have invoked several replays and probably a temporary stop to the show. Danielson of course isn't over enough to warrant that attention, but then why not use a jobber like Tatsu rather then someone you supposedly want to get over?
2. Not being on the show would have been less harmful to Danielson than Miz embarrasing him. Because though you can gloss over it however you like to, the image the fans have on Danielson is him getting his ass handed to him. Which wouldn't matter except that they are trying to get him over and Danielson hasn't done enough to seriously establish himself as a credible threat.
3. Even if sneak attacks during the entrance were a game breaker, the fact is that a main event face usually recovers from it. The face recooperates enough to actually have a match (albeit injured) whenever he's strong. Midcard faces attacked like that don't appear for the rest of the night. Such consistency is able to condition the fans on who is badass and who isn't.
1. I don't think it was glossed over. The announcers made quite a big deal about it from what I heard. Cole even took his mouth off of Miz's cock long enough to say how he couldn't condone that.Oh that argument. I tried to adress it, but I guess I didn't do a very good job:
1. It could be so much the sneak attack but how utterly glossed over it was. The same thing happening to Cena or Orton would have invoked several replays and probably a temporary stop to the show. Danielson of course isn't over enough to warrant that attention, but then why not use a jobber like Tatsu rather then someone you supposedly want to get over?
2. Not being on the show would have been less harmful to Danielson than Miz embarrasing him. Because though you can gloss over it however you like to, the image the fans have on Danielson is him getting his ass handed to him. Which wouldn't matter except that they are trying to get him over and Danielson hasn't done enough to seriously establish himself as a credible threat.
3. Even if sneak attacks during the entrance were a game breaker, the fact is that a main event face usually recovers from it. The face recooperates enough to actually have a match (albeit injured) whenever he's strong. Midcard faces attacked like that don't appear for the rest of the night. Such consistency is able to condition the fans on who is badass and who isn't.
fpalmyou are obviously the only one complaining about this
without the miz Daniel Bryan would'nt be over btw
Frankly, a LOT of it has to do with prior precedents in WWE. The beatdown didn't harm Bryan except that I am virtually certain that Bryan isn't going to actually get revenge or an actual feud over it; given that the Miz is already feuding with Cena and the Rock, the last thing I expect is for anything to come out of this little altercation outside of a match. Getting beatdown isn't damning, not being able to seriously DO anything about it makes you a jobber.1. I don't think it was glossed over. The announcers made quite a big deal about it from what I heard. Cole even took his mouth off of Miz's cock long enough to say how he couldn't condone that.
2. I don't think this harmed Bryan at all. Not in the slightest. He was attacked from behind and took the beating. It happens to a lot of faces.
I think by Miz being champion gives Bryan credibility. Bryan is the last person to take a title away from the Miz.
This happened right before the last match of the night. There was no need for Bryan to come back out. He took quite a brutal kayfabe beating. I'm sure Bryan will get his revenge soon.
I just don't see how this makes Bryan look bad in the slightest.
This, end thread.How does getting hit from behind, a sneak attack if you will, hurt Bryan's credibility?
The GM is openly pro Miz so don't count on anything like thatMaybe the annonoymous gm will book Miz V Bryan for the WWE title next week on Raw as punishment to the Miz's sneak attack??