To hop on the percentages bandwagon, allow me to implement some Steiner math to predict who I think has the best shot at winning each MITB ladder match. We’ll start with the women.
6. Guilia: 0%. She’ll be winning the US title within two months, probably at Evolution II. I simply don’t see her winning the MITB briefcase before that.
5. Alexa Bliss: 2%. Even though it looks like she has nothing to do with the Wyatt Sicks, there’s still that lingering non-title story going on with Charlotte and there’s no way their eventual partnership will have Charlotte playing second fiddle to her. They’ll be on equal terms, so even though Bliss’ popularity makes her a slightly more plausible choice than Guilia, I wouldn’t put too much stock in her chances.
4. Roxanne Perez: 3%. Too early for her to win something as huge as MITB only a few months into her main roster career. However, I have her chances slightly higher than Alexa’s because of what a win would mean in the Judgment Day storyline, which is the second most prominent story on RAW at the moment.
3. Stephanie Vaquer: 20%. They’re giving her the world and I wouldn’t be surprised if she won the Royal Rumble next year. That being said, it’s because of that early next year prediction that I don’t see her getting the rocket strapped to her that quickly with the briefcase.
2. Rhea Ripley: 35%. Four words: Mami in the Bank. And easy marketing slogan to make Rhea Ripley coded briefcases sell like hotcakes on WWEShop.com. And even without that, it’s Rhea Ripley. Arguably the face of the entire company right now, or at the very least Top 2 most popular wrestlers on the entire show. I’d have her at number one, except…
1. Naomi: 40%. Money in the Bank is ultimately a heel gimmick, or at the very least a heel-adjacent one. Look at the history, folks. Prior to two MITB matches per year, most winners/cash-ins were heelish in nature. And once we got two per year, we’ve had at least one heel winner/subsequent cash-in from every MITB PPV.
So why is this important to Naomi?
Simply because she’s the only heel in this match that has a remotely close chance of winning the briefcase. Also, take into account her recent rebranding and her ties within the Ano’ai family. Those are huge factors that can’t be ignored, either. But you might be wondering why any of this heel business matters since even if you subscribe to my theory, that doesn’t mean a heel woman has to win this match. It could easily be Rhea Ripley while a heel on the men’s side wins. Well, I’ve already taken that into account and I simply don’t see a heel winning on the men’s side. Why? Let’s find out.
6. Andrade: 0%. Let’s face it. He’s the Shelton Benjamin of this match: a spot monkey for the high spots and huge bumps who everyone and their mother knows doesn’t have a chance in hell of winning unless the other competitors all broke their spinal cords at the same time and an audible needed to be called.
5. Seth Rollins: 1%. Prior to last night’s RAW, I would’ve had him as my second, if not first, pick. But they telegraphed it way too hard that Seth won’t win. Sami made CM Punk RAW’s only hope against Seth, Punk failed, and Seth’s group stood tall over the heroes to close the show. Plus, Roman hasn’t been seen or talked about in weeks. C’mon. It couldn’t be more obvious that Seth has little to no chance of taking the briefcase. He only gets slightly more than 0% because he’s one of Triple H’s boys, but that’s all he gets. This also ties back into what I said about Naomi. Quite possibly the number one choice to win, a heel, just had their chances dropped down to damn near zero.
4. Solo Sikoa: 4%. It’s been obvious that the whole point of Solo, for now, is to get Jacob Fatu over. That means that Solo can’t appear to be better off than Jacob. Sure, he’s in the match while Jacob isn’t, but that’s through no fault of Jacob’s own and entirely on Solo. Solo will come out empty, the karmic payoff to this whole story beat, which will further continue the obvious strain between him and Jacob.
3. El Grande Americano: 10%. He’s only this high up because wild cards are a thing, and one theory of him winning the briefcase and cashing in on a AAA world title isn’t TOO far fetched for me to see outside the realm of probability. But he’s too attached to Chad Gable, someone that the higher ups don’t see as a big deal. That association alone brings his odds down.
2. Penta 15%. A super popular babyface with a marketable look, overness, and catchphrase. What more needs to be said? I don’t put too much stock into what this could mean for AAA, but that can’t be entirely dismissed as a key factor in his victory. But, it’s still a tad too early for him to be winning the briefcase, which severely hampers his chances of winning it. Can’t think of many, if any, times where that’s ever happened.
1. LA Knight: 70%. Well, well, well. Here we are again. While the WWE’s handling of LA Knight has been very, VERY questionable at times (most prominently two years ago at this very same event), I don’t have the same trepidation about his odds like I had last year. Nothing’s certain, of course, but everyone else seems so far removed from approaching him that I genuinely cannot see how he doesn’t take it this time. Yes, they’ve passed him over for less popular choices in the past, but they still see SOME value in him. He’s still a part of their Slim Jim marketing, which TKO wants to push even more now and LA Knight is still the main spokesperson for that brand. It’s too coincidental for all of this to be happening right now. It’s LA Knight’s time. I can feel it