Wrestling Forum banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
399 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Who else agrees? In fact, any non-title match should have meaning.

I'm not saying WWE should copy off TNA exactly, but they need to make matches actually mean something so the audience will be more inclined to watch. Get rid of this whole, throw 2 random wrestlers together at the last minute stuff.

Hype up matches weeks in advance... introduce new ways of getting the number 1 contender spot... such as first wrestler to get 3 wins received a title shot or something similar.

Oh and also, I think PPV's should be cut down to maybe one ever 1.5 months instead of every month or every 3 weeks. Storylines need more time to build up, and PPV buys will be greater.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,887 Posts
I'm not saying WWE should copy off TNA exactly, but they need to make matches actually mean something so the audience will be more inclined to watch. Get rid of this whole, throw 2 random wrestlers together at the last minute stuff.
are you implying that TNA's TV matches have meaning?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,306 Posts
Miz & R-Truth's mini feud with Punk seems to have meaning. They believe that they've been speaking their minds long before the initial shoot promo.
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top