Wrestling Forum banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3,330 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Simple question.

I feel that it's weird that all the matches seem to be normal matches, or am I forgetting something.

Will something be announced on the show itself?
Thoughts?
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
19,265 Posts
Stipulations dont make the card great.
This. The card looks pretty solid anyway. Maybe the HHH/Lesnar match should be a No DQ match, given the personal storyline, but Cena/Lesnar was No DQ, so I guess WWE think we've already seen that before so we don't want to see it again, idk, I just can't see them having a traditional wrestling match after everything that's happened (Lesnar kayfabe breaking HHH's arm, mentioning the kids and bringing Stephanie into it, attacking HBK, etc..)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,330 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Stipulations dont make the card great.
But they can make or break a feud.

Case in point: 2009, HHH vs Orton.
Everyone's conclusion: Good feud, great even, disappointing that the match at WM was a simple 1 on 1 match, despite the feud really needing a "hardcore" stipulation.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
359 Posts
But they can make or break a feud.

Case in point: 2009, HHH vs Orton.
Everyone's conclusion: Good feud, great even, disappointing that the match at WM was a simple 1 on 1 match, despite the feud really needing a "hardcore" stipulation.


The match did have to follow HBK/Taker

Look at WMX8

The forgotten match is Jericho vs HHH because they had to follow The Rock vs Hulk Hogan
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,330 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·

· Registered
Joined
·
3,506 Posts
yeah HHH/Lesnar desperately needs a stipulation, and i'm beginning to think they'll announce it at Summerslam.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,013 Posts
i rekon HHH not lookin at the contract wen he signed mite be where a stipluation comes from
 

· #WWELogic
Joined
·
4,341 Posts
Silly OP

It's WWE 2012......

Which means there saving all the stips for those "SPECTACULAR" gimmick PPV's after (HIAC/TLC ect)

Sight, I miss the days when ANY match type could be on ANY card but alas those days are LONG gone....perhaps they'll return....per harps.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
747 Posts
I actually really like that the show doesn't have any special stipulation matches. I feel like you don't need them to put on a good show. Stipulation matches should only be used when the situation calls for it and, from what I can see of the card, none of these matches warrant a stipulation. Other than HHH/Lesnar, of course, which I'm surprised hasn't been announced as a No DQ match yet. Perhaps that will be announced tomorrow. The rivalry is intense enough that it really should be some sort of No DQ match.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
4,689 Posts
The problem isn't the lack of stipulation, it's the lack of stimulation. They had a hell in a Cell PPV last year, and the main event would've felt more threatening if the bout took place in a pool of Jello. The WWE have a habit of throwing in stipulations for the fuck of it, and it waters down it's value.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
7,019 Posts
Meh with the addition of TLC, HIAC, Extreme Rules PPV's etc. It would seem a little redundant.

The problem isn't the lack of stipulation, it's the lack of stimulation. They had a hell in a Cell PPV last year, and the main event would've felt more threatening if the bout took place in a pool of Jello. The WWE have a habit of throwing in stipulations for the fuck of it, and it waters down it's value.
This. I completely forgot that Taker/HHH at WM28 was hell in a cell because the match was just so awesome on its own and they didnt even need the cell.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top