Wrestling Forum banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
15,438 Posts
:no: at the haters.. Nash > 80% of the WWE's roster especially the FCW clones. In fact I find Nash being in the WWE to be a lot less harmful than him being in TNA. TNA's youth are actually somewhat interesting to me and much more skilled than the spot that Nash would be "stealing" from some boring FCW clone hacks like Kofi Kingston or Ted DiBiase.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
15,438 Posts
At the end of the day, those guys (for however boring they may be) are better for the company because they're younger. Is Nash more charismatic than 80 (maybe more) percent of the young guys? It's possible. But he's 50.

Me and Paul Heyman have something in common: when it comes to Sports and Entertainment, I'm unapologetically ageist.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter for the company. The WWE has a monopoly on the industry no matter what and it isn't going to be in any trouble if they use Nash instead of one of the boring guys. As soon as Nash retires they'll just shove another FCW clone down your throat anyway.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top