[chazparks]

1990's WWF Title - 2010 WWE Title
1990's IC Title - 2010 WHC
1990's European - 2010 US/IC

 

[zombiemaster]

1990's WWF Title - 2010 WWE Title
1990's IC Title - 2010 WHC
1990's European - 2010 US/IC

European is normally less than US/IC but it was more when Miz was carrying the US title & not defending it

WHC is far more than IC and almost equal to WWE

 

[chazparks]

I'd agree the European should be less than the IC title. However, the IC/US title isn't defended like it was in the '80s (Savage vs Steamboat) '90s (HBK, Razor, Diesel). HBK and Razor's ladder match if held today would had been more for the WHC title than the IC title.

 

[Mr Nice Guy]

You want to know how WWE ranks the titles or how the internet ranks the titles?

 

[King Battlezone]

Every title sucks except the winged title.

 

[chazparks]

You want to know how WWE ranks the titles or how the internet ranks the titles?

More how the titles of today compare to the titles with the same names from the '90s.

Just looking at the titles today it would be
WWE, WHC
US, IC
Tag
with whichever happens to be RAW after the draft being ranked higher.

In the '90s there weren't two world titles so the IC title while being mid card still was worth more than it is today.

 

[METTY]

Hardcore title? Lol

 

[Catalanotto]

Tag titles shouldn't even rank because they pretty much mean nothing. The tag team division is practically non-existant and it's laughable how many times we have even seen the titles since they debuted the new (ugly) ones.

 

[ABrown]

1990's WWF Title - 2010 WWE Title
1990's IC Title - 2010 WHC
1990's European - 2010 US/IC

Based by today's system, I'd say that's pretty accurate. The WWE title is always going to be held in the highest regard, even though the WHC is supposed to be equivalent.

 

[Ph3n0m]

You're reading too much into it. It's as simple as this - World Titles now = World Title then, IC Title/US Title now = IC title then.

It's really not that hard to understand. You have the main title and the midcard title on each show - same format as it was for the single branded product in the 90s.

 

[chazparks]

You're reading too much into it. It's as simple as this - World Titles now = World Title then, IC Title/US Title now = IC title then.

It's really not that hard to understand. You have the main title and the midcard title on each show - same format as it was for the single branded product in the 90s.

Then where are the PPV show stealers for the midcard titles? Byran vs Dolph or HBK vs Razor?

 

[king953]

Its a huuuge difference between IC title then and now!
In 90`s it was wort like WHC ^^ there was awesome matches not little shitty matches like Dolph Vs Kofi.

It is even a bigger difference in the tag division! Miss the old times.

These days wrestling isnt as exciting as 90-2003 IMO

 

[Dr S]

WWE title looks too tacky, despite the fact I never watched WCW I still personally hold the WHC title in higher regard just becausenI can't take the WWE one seriously. Same as the Divas and new tag titles. I know its all about selling Merch but they're pissing on the history [/rant]

 

[acracker]

WHC is far more than IC and almost equal to WWE

far from it im afraid, its still the WCW belt. In fact i wouldn't be suprised if Hornswoggle won it but not the other belt, i wonder.......

 

[chazparks]

By the names World Heavyweight Championship should have more value than the local company's title (WWE) Championship but as long as the WHC title is on SmackDown it won't have as much weight.