Joined
·
979 Posts
just watched an interview with Mark Henry and he said that John Cena was the best WWE champion ever , do you agree?
is John Cena the best WWE champion ever?
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
Joined
·
2,269 Posts
Hahahahahaha. No, John Cena is not the best WWE Champion!
Joined
·
2,474 Posts
Joined
·
5,323 Posts
Your answer is likely to depend on the era you were brought up on.
Hulk Hogan, Steve Austin and John Cena are all legit choices.
Joined
·
3,430 Posts
Stone Cold says hello
Joined
·
10,028 Posts
HHH is the greatest wwe champion of all time, the title was his legit life
"I'll bash my grandmothers skull in with a sledgehammer to keep this belt"
- HHH
"I'll bash my grandmothers skull in with a sledgehammer to keep this belt"
- HHH
Joined
·
2,528 Posts
Joined
·
799 Posts
no
Joined
·
5,838 Posts
Lol no.
Joined
·
947 Posts
Emphatically, No.
Great champions like Hogan, Austin and The Rock raised the profile of the company and attracted new viewers. During Cena's decade long run as the face of the WWE, house shows barely draw 6,000 people despite cheap ticket prices, that they constantly had to go overseas and that well is starting to dry up. With the exception of Wrestlemania's, PPV buys are lower than in previous years. Cena is what Shawn Michaels was in 96 or Bret Hart in 93, rightfully the top star of the company but not good for business.
When he retires WWE will paint him as the greatest of all time and will probably say he drew more money than Hogan, Austin or The Rock, but don't be fooled. Hogan, Austin and The Rock had more or less a 3 year reign at the top, whilst Cena will likely have 15 years at the top to accumulate merchandising dollars and house show attendance.
Great champions like Hogan, Austin and The Rock raised the profile of the company and attracted new viewers. During Cena's decade long run as the face of the WWE, house shows barely draw 6,000 people despite cheap ticket prices, that they constantly had to go overseas and that well is starting to dry up. With the exception of Wrestlemania's, PPV buys are lower than in previous years. Cena is what Shawn Michaels was in 96 or Bret Hart in 93, rightfully the top star of the company but not good for business.
When he retires WWE will paint him as the greatest of all time and will probably say he drew more money than Hogan, Austin or The Rock, but don't be fooled. Hogan, Austin and The Rock had more or less a 3 year reign at the top, whilst Cena will likely have 15 years at the top to accumulate merchandising dollars and house show attendance.
Joined
·
2,528 Posts
Stop it. Before Cena was the face, the company was doing much worse financially and attendance wise. Take a look at the 2003 and 2004 average house show attendance and you'll catch my drift. They barely were drawing 4,000.
Joined
·
3,387 Posts
no maybe top 5
but as face of the company he belongs up there with austin, hogan, bruno
but as face of the company he belongs up there with austin, hogan, bruno
Joined
·
10,028 Posts
This. I remember attending shows in 03 and 04 at Allstate and it was only a half house sometimes for raws. Wwe wasn't making SHIT those 2 years
Joined
·
1,109 Posts
Has the title actually gained in prestige? No
Has he made the company bigger by being champion? No
Hogan and Austin did so thats that argument out the window
Has he made the company bigger by being champion? No
Hogan and Austin did so thats that argument out the window
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
Join the discussion
Join now to ask and comment!