Orton and Batista were on RAW when Brock left....If anything Cena would've beaten Lesnar at WM21...sigh, the hate the smarks have here blinds them from factAs a guy said above if brock never left, john cena wouldn't have gotten the super push he did. Probably Orton or Batista if not cena. There aren't many guys WWE have got fully behind except these 3-4.
Edge is too "skinny"Batista maybe? Edge? Had Brock never left the keys more than likely were his.
Batista never got the face of the company treatment. They swapped shows after winning their respective titles and Cena was off and running. If Batista did get the ball(he didn't but let's pretend he did) it was extremely brief.Edge is too "skinny"
Batista wtf are you talking about? It was Dave who got the push as the face of the Company Before Cena. Batista won the Rumble in 05, got a lenghty Main event match with the top heel of the Company at WM wehre he got put over big tim byt Triple H. Cena on the other hand, defeated JBL for the WWE Championship in an rushed match at the same WM, in favor of Batista and Triple H to get more time. Batista was the face of the Raw brand while Cena was that on the Smackdown brand. and it is a common knowledge that Raw is the flag ship show of WWE
But cena sold more merchandise, and Batista got a bad attitude backstage and they (WWE) eventually Went with Cena as the face of the company
Look at your avatar & signature. He would have been a much better option.Batista or Orton most likely.
But such a push would eventually failed with them. Batista was already pushing 37 (older than HHH) by the time he got his big break, so the mileage the WWE could get out of him was limited and Batista wouldn't have known how to deal with the boos that he would have surely started to get, mid way through his push.
Orton was still immature apparently at the time. So he surely wouldn't have been able to handle such responsibility at the time.
John Cena was the ONLY and the BEST answer.
:clapKeeping in mind atributes Cena has that regardless of what you think of him position him into the megapush he received, let us do some process of elimination.
Vince being the ultimate say and being notoriously bull-headed, no way does he waiver his prevailing philosphy of muscle = money/size is king, especially when not faced with a worldwide steroid scandal (If I recall there was a little flare up of a list of several prominant wrestlers on steroids around 2006 but this wasn't very big news at all for more than a day or two. While Edge has decent measurables at 6'3 (real height) 240, he didin't have near the muscle mass a non knicked up Cena had. This brings up another point that Cena in 05/06 had a pretty clean injury history, which further eliminates Edge, since WWE wouldn't bank on a man to be the franchise wrestler with such a severe previous neck injury like Edge or Angle. HHH had just come off a polarizing run especially in 03 where a great amount of product resources had invested him as the top dog of the flagship show which didn't match or surpass Hunter's legendary and acclaimed champion run from 99-00; with those facts in mind combined with possible grooming for his current role down the road, I don't think even with Cena out of the picture that HHH would reprise his top dog role ever again (though he still remained a main event guy obviously). Michaels and Taker were at the point of being beyond titles in their all time careers as their careers drew closer to te end. Vince has way too much of an ego to let a man who made a name for himself in another company be the absolute face, eliminating Booker and RVD (plus RVD's flaunting of being a stoner doesn't dictate well for uptight sponsors)
Love Cena or hate him, the man has a tireless work ethic, and in Vince's furtherment to get WWE to a more recognized global empire, this would be closer as would playing a face be better fincancially and in terms of sponsors in a softer society. Orton doesn't have the desire to fufill number one guy media/sponsor obligations nor is he very good at playing a moral driven, pandering face which separated him from being a top guy to THE top guy that Cena became. History tells us that Batista hates playing pandering face in a soft product, not to mention that while Cena isn't that phased by mixed reactions, Dave Batista has a very real reaction booing them right back and gets flustured even today by his current failed reaction, so I think that separated him from surpassing Cena (though to his credit early on he did match Cena). Obviously in a segment driven product, the top dog is going to be speaking a whole lot, which eliminated Benoit from the number one guy equation. They tried building Lashley as Lesnar 2.0, but Lashley turned out to be even less than a poor man's Lesnar and more of a beggar's pseduo Lesnar.
So the only man this leaves to be in Cena's position outsiide of John is Chris Masters, whom I fully believe could have taken the mantle if Cena never did. Guy if I remember correctly was even bigger muscle wise than Cena, a very marketable look certainly, had a tremendously low risk moveset, was a real young guy (I belive even if he signed today he would be only a few years passed 30), had a good presence, is a good guy, was improving in the ring his last run to where I think he was actually a decent worker, had a finisher that while Simple I think would've been very over with time (not to mention he would expand his moveset over time), and while I don't know Masters, I think that if invested in heavily could quit juicing. Sure Masters wasn't great on the stick, but I think he would've been servicible enough over time especially given his physical presence and natural charisma. I think he could've taken Cena's spot albeit I am unsure who to credit for this, but as I read one user say when discussing Cena there is an urbanization to wrestling factor that Cena brings that a guy like Masters couldn't.
Well spank my ass and call me a bitch. Acording to Wikipedia, Chris Masters is still 30. Was he like 22 during his first run then? I say, resign him non. He was a really good wrestler during his second run.Keeping in mind atributes Cena has that regardless of what you think of him position him into the megapush he received, let us do some process of elimination.
Vince being the ultimate say and being notoriously bull-headed, no way does he waiver his prevailing philosphy of muscle = money/size is king, especially when not faced with a worldwide steroid scandal (If I recall there was a little flare up of a list of several prominant wrestlers on steroids around 2006 but this wasn't very big news at all for more than a day or two. While Edge has decent measurables at 6'3 (real height) 240, he didin't have near the muscle mass a non knicked up Cena had. This brings up another point that Cena in 05/06 had a pretty clean injury history, which further eliminates Edge, since WWE wouldn't bank on a man to be the franchise wrestler with such a severe previous neck injury like Edge or Angle. HHH had just come off a polarizing run especially in 03 where a great amount of product resources had invested him as the top dog of the flagship show which didn't match or surpass Hunter's legendary and acclaimed champion run from 99-00; with those facts in mind combined with possible grooming for his current role down the road, I don't think even with Cena out of the picture that HHH would reprise his top dog role ever again (though he still remained a main event guy obviously). Michaels and Taker were at the point of being beyond titles in their all time careers as their careers drew closer to te end. Vince has way too much of an ego to let a man who made a name for himself in another company be the absolute face, eliminating Booker and RVD (plus RVD's flaunting of being a stoner doesn't dictate well for uptight sponsors)
Love Cena or hate him, the man has a tireless work ethic, and in Vince's furtherment to get WWE to a more recognized global empire, this would be closer as would playing a face be better fincancially and in terms of sponsors in a softer society. Orton doesn't have the desire to fufill number one guy media/sponsor obligations nor is he very good at playing a moral driven, pandering face which separated him from being a top guy to THE top guy that Cena became. History tells us that Batista hates playing pandering face in a soft product, not to mention that while Cena isn't that phased by mixed reactions, Dave Batista has a very real reaction booing them right back and gets flustured even today by his current failed reaction, so I think that separated him from surpassing Cena (though to his credit early on he did match Cena). Obviously in a segment driven product, the top dog is going to be speaking a whole lot, which eliminated Benoit from the number one guy equation. They tried building Lashley as Lesnar 2.0, but Lashley turned out to be even less than a poor man's Lesnar and more of a beggar's pseduo Lesnar.
So the only man this leaves to be in Cena's position outsiide of John is Chris Masters, whom I fully believe could have taken the mantle if Cena never did. Guy if I remember correctly was even bigger muscle wise than Cena, a very marketable look certainly, had a tremendously low risk moveset, was a real young guy (I belive even if he signed today he would be only a few years passed 30), had a good presence, is a good guy, was improving in the ring his last run to where I think he was actually a decent worker, had a finisher that while Simple I think would've been very over with time (not to mention he would expand his moveset over time), and while I don't know Masters, I think that if invested in heavily could quit juicing. Sure Masters wasn't great on the stick, but I think he would've been servicible enough over time especially given his physical presence and natural charisma. I think he could've taken Cena's spot albeit I am unsure who to credit for this, but as I read one user say when discussing Cena there is an urbanization to wrestling factor that Cena brings that a guy like Masters couldn't.