[Bobholly39]

That's actually not a bad idea. The things i like about your idea:

- Kane being in cahoot to help his friend Bryan
- Byran winning the rumble to main event, and finally win the title at mania
- LOVE the tag-team main event at Elimination Chamber

Things I don't like:

- HBK wrestling at elimination chamber. Just not gonna happen. But it can easily be HHH + someone else. Maybe Orton
- The shenanigans in the royal rumble match. Especially leading to the end of it. I'd like to see Kane with his turn elsewhere, or at least not at the end of the Rumble match. Bryan should win clean.The royal rumble is sacred, no cheating that way, it cheapens it.

 

[Luchini]

Then finally at Wrestlemania we can have Daniel Bryan vs Orton/Punk/Cena/Lesnar for the WWE championship and Daniel Bryan finally wins.

If they used a good percentage of their stars up in one match, what else would they fill the card with? Tons of Funk vs. Khali and Santino?

 

[Mr. WrestleMania]

That would take some serious thought. So, I doubt it will happen.

 

[Barry Horowitz]

Bryan entering at 30 and winning would be way too contrived. It's also the kind of storyline which only makes sense if they planned on making DB a huge star for years to come- something we all, I'm sure, highy doubt they would even consider.

Bryan VS The Authority looked like the beginning of a new "era," but has already started to look like just another throwaway storyline like the shameful/stupid walkout story or the promising Punk worked shoot/title unification stretch of wrestling history that they effectively attached an anchor to.

What makes these especially frustrating is that they tease the notion that REAL CHANGES will come to the product we are watching and turn out to be just another holdover angle to last ~ 3 ppvs (hmm, a fiscal quarter. Maybe that isn't a coincidence-I wonder how these angle stoppages correlate to WWE's fiscal calendar) never to be mentioned again.

Sent from Verticalsports.com Free App