[Sheik]

I just set it to show 25 posts per page and have found it to be way better than 10. It make's it easier and faster to lurk through threads and whatnot. It also means less time wasted loading pages and shit. Anybody else agree on this?

Yeah, I know, real thought provoking thread here...

 

[STALKER]

I'm also on 25 post per page. The reason being it is reading through the bigger threads.

 

[Goatlord]

Ditto, 25 pages per page is where it's at, the rest is too annoying, I don't want to waste time clicking on a houndred pages for every single thread. Wouldn't be against a 50 post option too.

 

[IJ]

I think it takes two seconds and doesn't matter too much, just opinion though, I see what your saying.

 

[scrilla]

Most forums I've ever went on had 25, but I never bothered to change this one from 10 and just got used to it.

 

[B-Dawg]

Anyone who isn't on 25 posts is a dumbass.

 

[NasJayz]

I prefer 25 posts per page.

 

[Hiplop]

i use 10, 25 looks off to me.

 

[Even Flow]

I used to have it on 10 posts per page and then I changed it to 25. It's been awesome ever since.

 

[RICH ROCKHEAD]

I didn't know there was an option to change posts per page.

 

[CC91]

25 posts per page, i don't get why people have less its more clicking

 

[Redwood]

25, anything higher is time consuming. I mean, I love a thought provoking debate about a certain topic of wrestling as the next guy (or girl), but...

 

[Kiz]

Is the highest option 25? The less pages to click through, the better.

 

[FITZ]

If I could have the whole website on one page I would do it...

So yeah, I view it 25 at a time.

 

[Rush]

25. easily the best.

 

[ADR LaVey]

10 posts per page. I like clicking.

 

[-SAW-]

I prefer pgdn to clicking, so 25.

 

[Refuse]

I didn't know there was an option, I might change it to 25 now.

 

[Tarfu]

Twenty five. Why isn't there a similar option for threads? 10 per page is effin' gay.

 

[Cerbs]

25, I don't fuck around.