I know the WWE treats viewers as though they don't have a great memory, but for argument's sake, let's analyze what's been laid out. C.M. Punk leads the "New" Nexus against John Cena now. Punk has cited Cena as a bully for the excess use of chairs on Wade Barrett and lambasts Barrett as someone who kept leading his guys to defeat as it were. A short time before the Barrett/Cena culmination, Punk (upon receiving a slammy) vowed retribution as he holds grudges aqainst an unnamed foe. A foe thought to be Daniel Bryan because the feud was interrupted by an injury to C.M. Punk before it could get under way and Cena had not yet beaten Barrett at TLC to back Punk's later reasoning. Nexus' "new management" with C.M. Punk as leader is also confusing for a few reasons. Was C.M. Punk, the current Nexus leader, not one of the first to get attacked by the original 8 members alongside Cena? Would that not have made him more likely to side with Cena on dispatching Wade Barrett? Lastly, couldn't Punk's leadership skills be called into question seeing as nearly every former Straight Edge Society member is gone, nor did they achieve anything under his leadership?
I know it's all kayfabe and storyline stuff, but these are the little things that clash and in my opinion muddy up things for the WWE creatively before they can get them off of the ground.
I know it's all kayfabe and storyline stuff, but these are the little things that clash and in my opinion muddy up things for the WWE creatively before they can get them off of the ground.