[CEEJ]

So you want a guy who hardly every actually wrestles, to win the belt, hold it basically until mid-year when Rollins returns? No thanks.

 

[Lone Star]

The object here is to build a new star and hopefully gain ratings while doing so. Triple H being involved hurts the chances of that happening.

The only thing he should do is put Reigns over, but even then a Triple H vs Roman Reigns WWE title match (I mean, look at that and tell me that's compelling, if you think so, you're a liar) isn't going to break the WM 3 record unless they have one hell of an undercard.

 

[Cobalt]

Would be cool to see Rollins take it off him if he returns as a face, but having HHH as champion for that long would be ridiculous I think.

Never know these days though.

 

[JTB33b]

The object here is to build a new star and hopefully gain ratings while doing so. Triple H being involved hurts the chances of that happening.

The only thing he should do is put Reigns over, but even then a Triple H vs Roman Reigns WWE title match (I mean, look at that and tell me that's compelling, if you think so, you're a liar) isn't going to break the WM 3 record unless they have one hell of an undercard.

I don't want that match to happen for the title, I am just saying if it did. Unfortunetely it's looking like a strong possibility. And Roman has been put over enough, I am already sick of his superman booking.

 

[anirioc]

Sorry but this is still no WCW.

 

[Stinger Fan]

I'd rather just keep Reigns as champion

 

[Bobholly39]

HHH nor Rock should be anywhere near the title Picture. *Especially* at wrestlemania.

It's just not believable. You don't "believe" in their characters caring about the title. HHH runs WWE, which is bigger than the title. Rock is a huge movie star, which is bigger than the title. Either of them going for the title seems forced, and a waste.


Brock Lesnar - although also a part-timer, is at least a bit more believable. Since WWE is all he has, even as a part-timer you can buy into him caring about being champion.

If HHH vs Reigns for the title happens, it should happen at Fastlane before mania, or simply be without the title.

 

[rude awakening]

Lol what a great Wrestlemania this will be. Even if it's semi decent, sheep will call it great just like they did with the mediocrity of 31.

 

[BlueBear]

HHH Costing Reigns the Rumble setting up there match at mania when Reigns ends the Authority is more likely in my opinion.

 

[Marrakesh]

The object here is to build a new star and hopefully gain ratings while doing so. Triple H being involved hurts the chances of that happening.

The only thing he should do is put Reigns over, but even then a Triple H vs Roman Reigns WWE title match (I mean, look at that and tell me that's compelling, if you think so, you're a liar) isn't going to break the WM 3 record unless they have one hell of an undercard.

Reigns is the new star they are attempting to build, so in that sense, HHH winning the title in the short term is not a bad idea. He brings back the edge and the 'Cerebral Assassin' character and puts Reigns over at Mania.

It's certainly better than Reigns retaining at the rumble against what should be insurmountable odds.

Reigns/HHH can be made compelling. It has potential, but it's down to WWE to pull a few surprises out of the bag and try and keep it as creative as possible. Refrain from having Reigns cut a promo every week. Nothing kills Reigns momentum more than a show opening promo.

 

[Chief of the Lynch Mob]

Please god no. HHH should not be a champion in 2016.

He can interfere in the match to perhaps cost Roman (Because Roman can't just lose any sort of match clean, remember), but that's all he should do.

 

[GeniusSmark]

I'd love it if Triple H was champion for at least 8 months. But I know I'd be disappointed if I expect a championship reign to be any where near as good as his past reigns. But I'll take whatever I get to see, considering it will be his last.

 

[Lone Star]

Reigns is the new star they are attempting to build, so in that sense, HHH winning the title in the short term is not a bad idea. He brings back the edge and the 'Cerebral Assassin' character and puts Reigns over at Mania.

It's certainly better than Reigns retaining at the rumble against what should be insurmountable odds.

Reigns/HHH can be made compelling. It has potential, but it's down to WWE to pull a few surprises out of the bag and try and keep it as creative as possible. Refrain from having Reigns cut a promo every week. Nothing kills Reigns momentum more than a show opening promo.

Nah, this should go to Brock Lesnar, WWE's biggest mainstream star. There's no better rub than capping off a overcoming all odds angle, than by beating Brock Lesnar. Also helps sell out AT&T Stadium. H isn't near the draw, Brock is.

Triple H vs Reigns at Fastlane is more believable.

 

[KingofKings1281]

Sorry in advance, everyone. I hope HHH runs through the rumble and pins Reigns at Mania. It won't happen, but it would be far more entertaining having Hunter as champ until someone actually deserves it. I'd kill to see a proper HHH/Owens feud for the belt.

 

[Drago]

I'd rather have HHH as a NXT champion, so I wouldn't need to watch Finn's reign anymore. :draper2