Joined
·
10,758 Posts
This, plus a lot of people diminish Trips's accomplishments because of his standing in the company.Triple H
HBK
Triple H
Triple H
Regardless, HBK will always be seen as the bigger star because his big match moments are more iconic.
HHH is no where near mediocre .. He is a great talent ..HBK in every category.
HHH is the definition of mediocre, in every sense of the word. He's just been around the right people and had the right attitude. Nothing more.
Level 1 : Austin , Rock , Hogan , Cenarofl HHH wishes he could be on the same level on HBK, who himself wishes he could be on the same level as Austin or Rock.
These guys are both backstage douchebags who have tried to buy their way to the top, and still aren't the same level as the real big stars.
As an HBK fan I would ashamed if anyone would ever compared HBK to people like Rock & Austin(mediocre wrestlers) who IMO are atleast two rungs lowerrofl HHH wishes he could be on the same level on HBK, who himself wishes he could be on the same level as Austin or Rock.
These guys are both backstage douchebags who have tried to buy their way to the top, and still aren't the same level as the real big stars.
Dude , stop joking .. Austin is the greatest of all time .. If you say HBK is in the same league as Austin , I would say your opinion , fine .. But 2 rungs lower .. Really ?!As an HBK fan I would ashamed if anyone would ever compared HBK to people like Rock & Austin(mediocre wrestlers) who IMO are atleast two rungs lower
You just said it was his opinion. "Better" isn't a quantitative term by any means. I think HBK is "better" than Austin, and that's my opinion. And I'm not alone in it. You can't act like Austin's "betterness" is a fact unless we're strictly speaking draw value. Do ratings and ticket sales really make someone a "better star"? Maybe by your definition, but that definition isn't shared by everyone. It's my opinion that if HBK hadn't been out for four years with an injury, thus missing the entire "Attitude Era" which the IWC covets as a sacred time when the WWF could do no wrong, (they actually could, and did, a lot of wrong; probably more wrong than they did right), it's my OPINION that there wouldn't even be this discussion of "HBK isn't in the same league as Rock and Austin". Frankly, that OPINION is one that, I believe, is based on when you began to love wrestling. I loved wrestling before and during the attitude era. A lot of people on this forum didn't start watching it until the attitude era. These people, I think, tend to be the ones who put Rock and Austin up on this pedestal that even Hogan supposedly can't touch because, again, rose-tinted glasses; they didn't care about wrestling until Rock and Austin, ergo the logic is that Rock and Austin are in a different league. Not everyone abides by this logic or agrees with the outcome. Deal with it.Dude , stop joking .. Austin is the greatest of all time .. If you say HBK is in the same league as Austin , I would say your opinion , fine .. But 2 rungs lower .. Really ?!
Austin is one of the biggest draws WWE ever had .. He has made more impact that HBK .. He has unmatched charisma and appeal .. HBK is very good in his own regards , but saying he is BETTER than Austin is kind of funny ..