[Bruze]

definitely a heel, more entertaining !

 

[BBoiz94]

Tweener.

 

[The 3D BluePrint.]

mm yeah true, Tweener.. But i'd go with heel now.

 

[Stephen365]

I'm saying heel

 

[.Misreadable.]

I like him when he's doing silly things and I think its more effective when he's a heel as opposed to being a face.

 

[The 3D BluePrint.]

Neck on neck race!

 

[Violent By Design]

A tweener is a face.

Anyway, Booker is great as a face. He's very funny, charismatic and fun to watch. Don't really see why he would make a good heel. I guess King Booker was pretty annoying.

 

[11Shareef]

He's always been overly booked as a heel. Stupid accents and such. I can never like him as heel, but he is a great babyface and he knows how to get the crowd behind him.

 

[thethunder]

Face wins it.

 

[Steph's Lover]

I always prefered Booker as a babyface especially between late 2002 and early 2003, that was easily the time he was most over the WWE crowd as a face and i really enjoyed his work but i will admit i found his heel run as King Booker very entertaining.

 

[Mr. Rager]

I liked him the most in 2002 as a Tweener

 

[wrestlemania2010]

face always funnier, better on the mic and more effective

 

[Da Alliance]

Face no doubt.

 

[PushShelton]

If it's King Booker, then it's a heel.