[RKing85]

It's all about the brand these days.

Passing the torch doesn't mean nearly as much now as it did 20-30 years ago.

 

[DGenerationMC]

18 months ago, I would've said yes.

Now, not so much. Maybe 33 or 34, if Reigns is in better standing with the audience. Still has some of that stank on him. Who knows? Maybe it's Rollins who Cena passes the torch to.

 

[Crewz]

Great idea, put Cena in the ring with Reigns so Cena can kill all his momentum... To be honest, that's exactly why i want to see that match at WrestleMania.

 

[WWE Is EWW]

Yeah, it is possible that Cena will "pass the torch" at Mania and then end up having more WWE matches than Reigns after Mania.

 

[Lone Star]

Passing the torch means something when it's said, you know it's a big moment/match. Casuals see it as something they haven't saw before and draw interest into.

But no. Cena/Undertaker has multiple options in storylines. Much more of a draw. Reigns/Cena is just bland promo's and buildups with no effort behind them.

 

[mitchy the shrimp]

I think Cena has another 10 years in him with his own "Hollywood Hogan" run. Call him CEO Cena or Celebrity Cena. Continue to build Reigns into the top star to where everyone is behind him. Have him face the top heel at WM, where he's ganged up on, then Cena comes for the save after a leave of absence, only to turn on RR and cost him the title. This leads to Cena's heel run putting over Reigns and passing the torch.

 

[Ratedr4life]

Cena would get cheered over Reigns. Cena/Reigns would go very similar to Cena/HHH from WM22. It would just hurt Roman in the long-run.

 

[Q-MAN]

Cena doesn't have a torch to pass since he used up all the fuel burning the bodies of everyone he has ever buried.

 

[Captain Edd]

The torch is part of Cenas body, you can not remove it.

 

[Godway]

There is no passing the torch between such dopey characters. Guy who got booed for 10 years but sold merchandise passes the torch to guy who got booed much harder for a year, and doesn't sell as much merchandise???? It's a fucking farce.

There's no torch passing in something that is so blatantly manufactured. And the audience won't give a shit either. They could very well boo this match out of the building. Or give it a completely awful response like they did to Cena/Rock II.

 

[JimCornette]

I have no interest in this match. Well the only fun thing about it might be the crowd giving it the Lesnar/Goldberg treatment. In terms of quality, it'd be just like watching Cena vs Batista or Orton. In other words, shit.

 

[Indywrestlersrule]

Eh better then doing Roman/Brock II which would have zero point to existing unless they are undoing all the hard work on Roman an putting the belt back on Brock

 

[Lothario]

No. Too soon.

 

[3ku1]

Worrying ppl think.Reigns has what it takes to.receive a passing of sorts. But i guess they are going to push him no matter what. Im.not.sure how Wwe is going to be with.When it.Reigns it bores carrying the company lol. As it is prob too soon.

 

[yeahbaby!]

No. Would be the perfect place for Cena to tap out Reigns.

 

[MJ]

Not yet. I would love to see this match when the time is right. You need to start changing Cena's character up a bit over the year to prepare him for this feud, and you need to give Roman some strong title defences against top stars such as HHH and Lesnar. Above all, Roman needs to come out of those programs as a more polished champion and a star that is worthy of a "passing of the torch". For Cena, have him show some subtle signs of jealously throughout 2016 when associating with Reigns and even other main event talent, such as Rollins and Owens. Make him feel like he is being pushed down by the younger main event players, so that he can play off of this in the rivalry with Reigns. This way, this feud could actually work when both characters are ready, which would probably be WM33. There is no reason to rush would could be a very important match and moment for Reigns.

 

[Drago]

The torch is part of Cenas body, you can not remove it.

:LIGHTS